实际上,我想在厨师属性中使用这样的构造,在这里,我用常量初始化结构并修改它。
init_value = { "a" => { "b" => "c" } }
prepare = init_value
prepare["a"]["x"] = "y"现在init_value也包含["a"]["x"] = "y",所以当我准备一个新的值时
prepare = init_value
prepare["a"]["y"] = "x"所以prepare["a"]包含["b", "x", "y"]键。
如何在不引用常量的情况下使用常量初始化step,以便在最后一步中,prepare["a"]只包含两个键["b","y"]
发布于 2017-05-23 19:17:05
您可以将初始哈希移到方法中。这样,该方法总是返回一个“新”哈希:
def init_value
{"a"=>{"b"=>"c"}}
end
prepare = init_value
prepare["a"]["x"] = "y"
prepare
#=> {"a"=>{"b"=>"c", "x"=>"y"}}
prepare = init_value
prepare["a"]["y"] = "x"
prepare
#=> {"a"=>{"b"=>"c", "y"=>"x"}}发布于 2017-05-23 16:31:29
提取自Rails 4.2.7
Object#deep_dup“返回对象的深度副本。如果它不是可复制的,则返回self。Hash#deep_dup“返回一个深入的哈希副本。Array#deep_dup“返回数组的深度副本。执行情况:
class Object
def duplicable?
true
end
def deep_dup
duplicable? ? dup : self
end
end
class Hash
def deep_dup
each_with_object(dup) do |(key, value), hash|
hash[key.deep_dup] = value.deep_dup
end
end
end
class Array
def deep_dup
map { |it| it.deep_dup }
end
end
# Not duplicable?
# if ruby version < 2.0 also add Class and Module as they were not duplicable until 2.0
[Method, Symbol, FalseClass, TrueClass, NilClass, Numeric, BigDecimal].each do |m|
m.send(:define_method, :duplicable?, ->{false})
end然后,您可以为init_value使用一个方法,这样就可以始终调用deep_dup,而不会意外地忘记
#since you asked for a constant
INIT_VALUE = { "a" => { "b" => "c" } }.freeze
def init_value
INIT_VALUE.deep_dup
end以及使用情况
prepare = init_value
prepare["a"]["x"] = "y"
prepare2 = init_value
prepare2["a"]["y"] = "x"
prepare
#=> {"a"=>{"b"=>"c", "x"=>"y"}}
prepare2
#=> {"a"=>{"b"=>"c", "y"=>"x"}}发布于 2017-05-23 15:56:49
我认为你在分配准备时想要一份init_value的“深拷贝”。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44139644
复制相似问题