是否有一种简单的方法可以在java 8中使用一些库来并行一个foreach循环?
void someFunction(SomeType stuff, SomeType andStuff) {
for (Object object : lotsOfObjects)
object.doSomethingThatCanBeDoneInParallel(stuff, andStuff);
}多线程是有点痛苦和耗时,所以我想知道是否有一个更简单的方法来做上述使用某些库。
谢谢。
2018年6月3日编辑
ExecutorServices非常方便--事实上,我不能使用wait ()来等待,因为我运行每个帧并创建一个新的ExecutorServices --每个帧都太昂贵了。
最后,我写了一个类来并行一个fori循环,我想我和其他像我一样的新手分享它。
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
public class ParallelForI {
public ParallelForI(int numberOfThread) {
NUMBER_OF_THREAD = numberOfThread;
executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(NUMBER_OF_THREAD);
finished = new AtomicBoolean[NUMBER_OF_THREAD];
for (int i = 0; i < finished.length; i++)
finished[i] = new AtomicBoolean(true);
// true is better for waitForLastRun before any run.
}
private ExecutorService executorService;
private final int NUMBER_OF_THREAD;
private AtomicBoolean[] finished;
public void waitForLastRun() {
synchronized (this) {
/* synchronized outside the loop so other thread
can't notify when it's not waiting. */
for (int i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_THREAD; i++) {
if (!finished[i].get()) {
i = -1;
try {
this.wait(); //
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// do nothing and move one.
}
}
}
}
}
public void run(FunctionForI functionForI, final int MAX_I) {
for (AtomicBoolean finished : finished)
finished.set(false); // just started
for (int i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_THREAD; i++) {
final int threadNumber = i;
executorService.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override // use lambda if you have java 8 or above
public void run() {
int iInitial = threadNumber * MAX_I / NUMBER_OF_THREAD;
int iSmallerThan;
if (threadNumber == NUMBER_OF_THREAD - 1) // last thread
iSmallerThan = MAX_I;
else
iSmallerThan = (threadNumber + 1) * MAX_I / NUMBER_OF_THREAD;
for (int i1 = iInitial; i1 < iSmallerThan; i1++) {
functionForI.run(i1);
}
finished[threadNumber].set(true);
synchronized (this) {
this.notify();
}
}
});
}
}
public interface FunctionForI {
void run(int i);
}
}这就是使用它的方法:
void someFunction(final SomeType stuff, final SomeType andStuff) {
ParallelForI parallelForI = new parallelForI(numberOfThread);
// swap numberOfThread with a suitable int
parallelForI.run(new ParallelForI.FunctionForI() {
@Override // use lambda if you have java 8 or above
public void run(int i) {
lotsOfObjects[i].doSomethingThatCanBeDoneInParallel(stuff, andStuff);
// don't have to be array.
}
}, lotsOfObjects.length); // again, don't have to be array
parallellForI.waitForLastRun(); // put this where ever you want
// You can even put this before parallelForI.run().
// Although it doesn't make sense to do that...
// Unlike shutdown() waitForLastRun() will not cause parallelForI to reject future task.
}发布于 2018-05-12 11:37:59
解决方案可以是启动Thread中的每个任务,如下所示:
new Thread(() -> object.doSomethingThatCanBeDoneInParallel(stuff, andStuff)).start();但是这不是一个相关的解决方案,因为创建线程成本很高,所以有一些机制和工具可以帮助您:构建一些Executors类的pools。
一旦您有了将管理它的实例,就会为它提供任务,这些任务将在您选择的线程数上并行运行:
void someFunction(SomeType stuff, SomeType andStuff) {
ExecutorService exe = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4); // 4 can be changed of course
for (Object object : lotsOfObjects) {
exe.submit(() -> object.doSomethingThatCanBeDoneInParallel(stuff, andStuff));
}
// Following lines are optional, depending if you need to wait until all tasks are finished or not
exe.shutdown();
try {
exe.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}发布于 2018-05-12 11:35:27
使用并行流。但这不是一个普遍的解决办法。
发布于 2018-05-12 11:38:04
java中的For循环本质上是串行的。没有办法对他们做这样的事。但是,通过引入流,可以使用它们对集合上的操作进行并行化。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50305765
复制相似问题