blocks|key|3834274|text|有几种工具用于人工智能驱动测试(+AI+-DT).下面是一些工具的列表，他们有一些试用版，但不确定开放源码。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3834275|终测|unordered-list-item|3834276|幽灵探长|3834277|Testim|3834278|特斯博特|3834279|EvoSuite|3834280|ReTest|3834281|功能化|3834282|AppDiff|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|D|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|D|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|D|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|D|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|D|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|S|$]]

There are several tools for the AI Driven Testing (AI-DT). here is the list of few tool they have some trial version period but not sure about the open source. 

<ul>
<li>Endtest</li>
<li>Ghost Inspector</li>
<li>Testim</li>
<li>Tesabot</li>
<li>EvoSuite</li>
<li>ReTest</li>
<li>functionize</li>
<li>AppDiff</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|3834435|text|首先，我怀疑目前是否有类似于人工智能驱动的测试。*-driven意味着您的整个开发/测试过程都非常依赖于*。我本人为重测工作，我确信--由于我在那里的经验--人工智能可以极大地帮助补充传统的测试方法。但是:今天的人工智能比手工编写的测试脚本更逊于测试生成。(至少现在是这样。)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|3834436|例如，Testim集成了历史数据，对每个元素的定位器分别进行排序，以稳定测试。这是令人敬畏的，并可能导致重新捕获和重播。但是，您仍然手动创建测试，因为人工决定了测试的内容和方法。因此，我不会谈论人工智能驱动的测试。|3834437|回到你的实际问题:当你说你尝试了Testim和Endtest，我想你想测试网络应用？不幸的是，我不知道类似的开源解决方案，但我认为这只是时间问题，直到社区在Selenium等工具的基础上开发出来。现有的使用AI的开源测试工具有EvoSuite+(单元测试生成)和推断+(静态代码分析)。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://retest.de/en/|1|https://testim.io/|2|https://www.seleniumhq.org/docs/02_selenium_ide.jsp#locating-elements|3|http://evosuite.org/|4|http://fbinfer.com/^0|O|1|1G|1|1M|2|0|0|3|6|1|N|3|2|0|35|8|3|3N|2|4^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Y|8|@$9|Z|A|10|B|C]|$9|11|A|12|B|C]]|D|@$9|13|A|14|1|15]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|16|8|@]|D|@$9|17|A|18|1|19]|$9|1A|A|1B|1|1C]]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|D|@$9|1E|A|1F|1|1G]|$9|1H|A|1I|1|1J]]|E|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|E|$O|P]]|Q|$5|L|M|N|E|$O|R]]|S|$5|L|M|N|E|$O|T]]|U|$5|L|M|N|E|$O|V]]|W|$5|L|M|N|E|$O|X]]]]

First of all, I doubt that there is currently something like AI-driven testing. <code>*</code>-driven means that your entire development/testing process strongly relies on <code>*</code>. Working for <a href="https://retest.de/en/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">retest</a> myself, I'm convinced—due to my experience there—that AI can be a great help to complement traditional testing approaches. But: Today's AI is inferior to hand-crafted test scripts when it comes to test generation. (At least for now.)

<a href="https://testim.io/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Testim</a>, for instance, incorporates historical data to rank the <a href="https://www.seleniumhq.org/docs/02_selenium_ide.jsp#locating-elements" rel="nofollow noreferrer">locators</a> for each element individually to stabilize the tests over time. This is awesome and may lead to a comeback of capture &amp; replay. However, you still create tests manually since a human decides what to test and how. Therefore, I wouldn't speak of AI-driven testing.

To get back to your actual question: When you say you tried out Testim and Endtest, I assume you want to test web apps? Unfortunately, I'm not aware of similar open-source solutions, but I think it's just a matter of time until it's developed by the community on top of tools such as Selenium. Existing open source testing tools that use AI are e.g. <a href="http://evosuite.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">EvoSuite</a> (unit test generation) and <a href="http://fbinfer.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Infer</a> (static code analysis).

blocks|key|3834340|text|您使用Selenium吗？克劳斯(前同事)目前在业余时间做一个附带项目，用AI扩展selenium测试。他正在寻找贡献者和测试人员。也许你有兴趣加入他？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/klaushauschild1984/selenium-toys^0|D|8|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

Do you use Selenium? <a href="https://github.com/klaushauschild1984/selenium-toys" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Klaus (ex-colleague)</a> currently works on a side project in his spare time to extend selenium tests with AI. He is looking for contributors and testers. Maybe you are interested to join him?

blocks|key|3834485|text|有关AI驱动的测试工具的信息整合在阿芙斯景观中，但是没有开源的已知解决方案。这还有点早。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3834486|P.S.：我是AIFORSE社区的一部分，但它不附属于景观中列出的任何工具。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://aiforse.org/^0|H|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|F|$G|$5|H|I|J|C|$K|L]]]]

Information about AI-driven Testing Tools is consolidated in the <a href="http://aiforse.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">AIFORSE Landscape</a>, but there're no known Solutions which would be open source. It's a bit early for this.

P.S.: I'm a part of the AIFORSE Community, but it is not affiliated with any of the Tools listed in the Landscape.

blocks|key|3867436|text|我现在不知道任何开源项目，甚至是开源项目。鉴于我们在Appvance花了这么多年时间才使用19种不同的人工智能算法实现机器生成的测试(6年和30人团队)，对于一个开源项目来说，这似乎是一项艰巨的任务。我们的代码大约有400万行，而且还在增长。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3867437|也就是说，AI生成的测试可以减少90%25或更多的脚本需求，并为许多应用程序提供近100%25的覆盖率，而不是所有应用程序。|3867438|虽然我知道每个人都想要免费的工具，但有真正的ROI和储蓄转移到AI生成的测试上，远远超过了技术的成本。质量保证中的人员成本大于技术成本。有可能有些软件，加上优秀的支持，是值得付出代价的。|3867439|免责声明-我为Appvance.ai工作|offset|length|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://www.appvance.ai/^0|0|0|0|7|B|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$H|U|I|V|1|W]]|A|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|A|$O|P]]]]

I am not aware of anything open-source at this time or even an open source project. Given how many years it took us at Appvance to achieve machine generated tests (6 years and a team of 30 people) using 19 different AI algorithms, it would seem a daunting task for an open source project. We are at about 4 million lines of code and growing.

That said, AI generated tests can reduce the need to script by 90% or more, and provide close to 100% coverage of many, but not all, applications. 

While I know everyone wants free tools, there is real ROI and savings moving to AI generated tests that far exceeds the cost of the technology. People costs in QA outweigh technology costs. It's possible that some software, with excellent support, is worth paying for.

Disclaimer - I work for <a href="https://www.appvance.ai" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Appvance.ai</a>

I am new to AI Driven Testing (AI-DT). I've explored few tools like testim.io, endtest.io. Is any other open source tools are there to achieve this?

AI Driven Testing (AI-DT) open source tools

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我是新的人工智能驱动测试( AI -DT)。我几乎没有研究过像testim.io，endtest.io这样的工具。还有其他开源工具可以实现这一点吗？

问AI驱动测试(AI-DT)开放源码工具
EN

回答 5

Stack Exchange QA用户

Stack Exchange QA用户

Stack Exchange QA用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问AI驱动测试(AI-DT)开放源码工具EN

回答 5

Stack Exchange QA用户

Stack Exchange QA用户

Stack Exchange QA用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问AI驱动测试(AI-DT)开放源码工具
EN