blocks|key|844782|text|无论你能支持最好的操作系统--认真地说，对于你已经描述过的相对基本的东西，它们都能做得足够好，所以这取决于你设置它的速度，它的启动和运行频率，以及当它崩溃时你可以多快地修复它--所以在我看来，最好的操作系统就是你自己在这些情况下能处理的最好的操作系统。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

Whichever OS you can support the best - seriously, for relatively basic stuff as you've described they can all do a good enough job so it comes down to how quickly you can set it up, how often it stays up and running and how quickly you can fix it when it breaks - so in my mind the best is the one that you yourself can deal with best in these situations.

blocks|key|4584018|text|你们有备用系统吗？如果是这样的话，openfiler或FreeNAS有很好的声誉，因为它是专门为这项任务而制作的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4584019|易于维护，可作为网络存储设备使用，具有软件RAID等功能，以及从web接口维护它的能力，而且您可以相对轻松地扩展存储。|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

Do you have a spare system? If so, openfiler or FreeNAS have good reputations for being made specifically for this task.

Easy to maintain, it's made to be used as a network storage device, has features available like software RAID and the ability to maintain it from a web interface, and you can expand storage relatively easily.

blocks|key|4584108|text|我建议您使用Microsoft+Windows+Home+Server。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4584109|首先，它将执行您正在寻找的任务:网络存储。但是有了一个复制系统，以避免丢失数据。|4584110|它还将为您的所有Windows计算机提供一个非常强大的备份系统。|4584111|更多:远程访问你的文件，音乐，照片，许多附加的.|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

I would recommend you Microsoft Windows Home Server.

First it will do what you are looking for: a network storage. but with a duplication system to avoid losing data.

It will also provide you a really powerful backup system for all your Windows computers.

And more: Remote access to your files, music, photos, many add-ins...

blocks|key|4584152|text|FreeNAS是超级，超级简单和快速。你可以在十分钟内就餐。不要为MS试图将其作为“家庭服务器”出售的令人厌恶的东西买单。FreeNAS是BSD派生的，但是一旦您移除键盘和监视器，您将根本看不到它是BSD。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

FreeNAS is super, super simple and fast. You can be set up and serving in ten minutes. DO NOT PAY for that abomination that MS is trying sell as the "Home Server". FreeNAS is BSD derived, but you'll basically never see that it's BSD once you remove the keyboard and monitor.

blocks|key|845030|text|我使用OpenSolaris和ZFS作为文件系统运行文件服务器。文件服务器功能有很好的文档记录，ZFS允许轻松地共享文件系统。我的朋友Simon有一个详细的方法来构建一个自制的文件服务器，包括他的硬件选择和ZFS的优势。http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/^0|32|1O|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

I run a fileserver using OpenSolaris and ZFS as a filesystem. The fileserver capabilities are well documented and ZFS allows easy sharing of filesystems. My buddy Simon has a detailed howto to build a home-made fileserver including his hardware choice and the advantages of ZFS. <a href="http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/</a>

blocks|key|844703|text|Linux和Samba。适用于所有客户端操作系统，无需向微软支付任何费用！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

Linux and Samba. Works with all client operating systems without paying Microsoft anything!

blocks|key|844715|text|我同意，Linux+(samba)通常更容易维护(对于那些难以解决的问题来说，不需要重新安装)，可以永远运行，而无需缓慢运行或重新启动。占用较少的系统资源，通常情况下会更快，除非您无法为您的硬件获得合适的驱动程序。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I agree, Linux (samba) is mostly easier to maintain (no reinstalls needed for those difficult to solve problems), can run forever without ever getting slow or needing to be rebooted. Takes less system resources, is most of the time quicker unless you can't get the right drivers for your hardware.

blocks|key|844812|text|我不使用Linux，而是使用FreeBSD。一旦正确配置和设置，您就可以忘记它，专注于其他任务。如果不是因为硬件，我怀疑会不会出现问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|844813|如果您决定使用linux发行版，我会选择Debian或Gentoo，当然没有任何花哨。|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

Instead of a Linux, I'd use a FreeBSD. Once correctly configured and set up, you can just forget about it and concentrate on other tasks. Were it not for the hardware, I'd doubt a problem would ever arise.

If you decide to go for a linux distribution, I'd go for Debian or Gentoo, without anything fancy of course.

blocks|key|4584222|text|证候学卖的是很棒的电器。它们易于管理和处理许多协议(SMB、AFP、FTP等)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4584223|这是一个完美的家庭系统或小公司。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.synology/^0|0|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|F|$G|$5|H|I|J|C|$K|L]]]]

<a href="http://www.synology" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Synology</a> is selling great appliances.
They are easy to manage and handle a lot of protocol (SMB, AFP, FTP, etc).

It is perfect for a home system or a small company.

blocks|key|4584343|text|我推荐使用RAIDZ或RAIDZ2的Solaris。我已经成功地使用它来使用AFP、NFS和CIFS共享文件。RAIDZ不仅可以提供RAID5的好处，还可以检测和修复损坏的文件。我还发现，Solaris在重载下的性能要比Linux好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I would recommend Solaris with RAIDZ or RAIDZ2. I've used this successfully to share files using AFP, NFS, and CIFS. RAIDZ will not only provide the benefits of RAID5 as far as being able to lose a disk, it also can detect and repair corrupt files. I've also found that Solaris behaves better under heavy load than Linux does.

blocks|key|844829|text|如果您知道BSD或Linux，请使用其中之一。如果你还没听说过，你可以花95美元买到32+NewEgg位SP1。您没有指定操作系统应该是免费的，所以这可能是一种选择。如果你不想支付任何东西，并且有一点时间或技巧，那么我会尝试设置一个FreeBSD框。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116550^0|16|D|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

If you know BSD or Linux go ahead with one of those. If you don't and haven't heard yet, you can get <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116550" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Microsoft Windows Home Server 32 bit SP1 (NewEgg)</a> for $95. You didn't specify that the OS should be free, so this could be a choice. If you don't want to pay anything and have a bit of time or know-how, then I'd try setting up a FreeBSD box.

blocks|key|4584311|text|我会在HFS.exe文件服务器或FHFS中使用Windows。其理由是，它是预先配置的用户帐户功能，上传，权限，会话监控等。所有的东西，文件服务器需要。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Servers/WEB-Servers/HTTP-File-Server.shtml|1|http://sourceforge.net/projects/fhfs/^0|3|7|0|G|4|1^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]|$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]|K|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|L]]]]

I would use Windows with <a href="http://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Servers/WEB-Servers/HTTP-File-Server.shtml" rel="nofollow noreferrer">HFS.exe</a> file server or <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/fhfs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">FHFS</a> . The reasoning is because it is pre-configured with user account functionality, uploads, permissions, session monitoring, etc. All the things a file server needs.

blocks|key|845064|text|最重要的是对系统的了解。我自己的专业知识和经验来自于Windows领域，因此，如果在基于Windows的系统中出现问题，在NTFS格式的磁盘中出现问题，我相信我能够解决这个问题。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|845065|我的Linux知识充其量是中等水平的，而且作为OEM供应商提供的产品，比如Synology，我几乎控制不了什么。我不能说如果发生错误我可以修复其中的任何一个。|845066|跟着你最舒服的东西走吧。当涉及到存储大量文件时，在系统故障时恢复数据必须是您准备处理的。|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

That most important thing is knowledge of the system. My own expertise and experience stems from the Windows field, and hence if something goes wrong in Windows-based system with disks formatted in NTFS, I'm confident that I can address the issue.

My Linux knowledge is somewhat intermediate at best, and as offerings from OEM vendors such a Synology, I've very little control over what goes under the hood. can't say I can fix either of them if errors happen.

Go with what you're most comfortable with. When it comes to storing large amounts of file, recovery of data in the event of system failure must be something you are prepared to handle.

Im looking to set up a simple fileserver:

<ul>
<li>5 - 7 clients - Mixed Windows, Linux, Mac OSX - connecting over wireless and wired</li>
<li>Serving ~200GB content -
Photos, MP3's, ISO's etc</li>
</ul>

What OS would you recommend for this fileserver? I understand XP limits the number of when connecting to different shares so this probably isnt the best choice.

Any recommendations are appreciated.

Thank you,

What OS would you use for a simple fileserver and why?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我希望设置一个简单的文件服务器：5-7客户端-混合Windows，Linux，Mac通过无线和有线连接提供200‘s内容-照片、MP3's、ISO等您推荐给这个文件服务器的操作系统是什么？我知道XP限制了连接到不同共享的数量，所以这可能不是最好的选择。如有任何建议，我们将不胜感激。谢谢,

问对于一个简单的文件服务器，您会使用什么操作系统?为什么？
EN

回答 13

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问对于一个简单的文件服务器，您会使用什么操作系统?为什么？EN

回答 13

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问对于一个简单的文件服务器，您会使用什么操作系统?为什么？
EN