blocks|key|4960781|text|我想你会发现，得到两个具有完全相同规格的系统是相当困难的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4960782|但是，如果硬件是相同的，系统应该运行相同。|4960783|品牌忠诚度很少涉及硬件规格，更多的是关于支持、退货政策、当你收到系统时安装的内容、产品周围的社区以及其他用户体验的东西。|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

I think you'll find that getting two systems which have the exact same specs is pretty difficult.

But if the hardware is identical the systems should run the same.

Brand loyalty is rarely about the hardware specs and more about support, return policies, what was installed when you received the system, community around the product and the other user-experience things.

blocks|key|4960831|text|这里有几个主要因素。一个是建设质量，另一个是支持。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4960832|就构建质量而言，仅仅因为两台机器使用“相同的硬件”并不意味着它们使用的是所有相同的硬件。像粉丝，特定的模型，等等都会有很大的差异。我知道，特别是索尼，在过去的几年里有很多风扇布局设计问题。|4960833|在企业环境中，支持可以成为主要参与者。我没有直接的经验，索尼支持，但我自己和几乎所有我认识的人持有戴尔支持的高度敬意。拥有一台设计/制造不佳的机器是一回事，但在上面支撑得不好可能是折断骆驼背的一根稻草。|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

There are a couple of major factors here. One is build quality, the other is support.

As far as build quality goes, just because two machines use the "same hardware" doesn't mean they're using ALL the same hardware. Things like fans, specific models, etc can vary widely. I know that Sony in particular has had a lot of fan layout design problems over the last few years.

In an enterprise environment, support can be a major player. I don't have direct experience with Sony support, but myself and pretty much everyone I know hold Dell support in high regards. Having a poorly designed/built machine is one thing, but having poor support on top of it can really be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

blocks|key|4960891|text|单支通道。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4960892|单一管理工具|4960893|不要低估这一点。|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

Single support channel.

Single management tools

Do not underestimate this.

blocks|key|859686|text|如果你选择像索尼这样的消费者供应商来进行公司笔记本电脑的部署，那么你很可能是出于错误的原因忠于这个品牌的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

If you're choosing a consumer vendor like Sony for a corporate laptop deployment, you're most likely being loyal to the brand for the wrong reasons.

blocks|key|4960803|text|在硬件级别上可能还存在其他差异，但一般来说，如果您要求的是相同的行为，那么您应该会看到很多相同的行为。还有其他的问题，如外观、保修支持和服务。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

There may still be other differences on the hardware level, but in general you should see much the same behaviour, if that's what you're asking. Then there are other matters such as looks and warranty support and service.

blocks|key|859671|text|成像。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|859672|我更喜欢我的所有机器来自同一个制造商，这样我至少有一个合理的机会，能够建立一个健全的硬件独立形象。|859673|这也意味着只有一个人可以在需要的时候打电话和大声喊叫。|859674|为了支持个人电脑(服务器将是不同的)，只要我有一个合理的保修和可以得到更换部分，我真的不介意其他。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

Imaging.

I prefer all my machines to come from the same manufacturer so that I at least get a reasonable chance of being able to build a sane hardware independent image.

It also means only one person to get on the phone to and yell at when required.

For support of PCs (servers would be different) as long as I have a reasonable warranty and can get replacement parts, I don't really mind otherwise.

blocks|key|859736|text|我知道这是一个迟来的补充，但在成像公司台式机的主题(特别是大量)，戴尔提供的能力，使您的机器与您自己的图像预装。其他供应商也可能提供这方面的服务；我没有参与我们的业务，但值得考虑。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I know this is a late addition, but on the topic of imaging corporate desktops (especially large numbers), Dell offers the ability to get your machines with your own image pre-installed. Other vendors may also offer this; I've not been involved in that side of our operation, but it's worth considering.

blocks|key|859822|text|典型的单一供应商。如果我们有一个特殊的应用程序，或者可以以同样的价格获得更高质量的供应商，我们就会选择双供应商--但只有双供应商。台式机，我们保持所有相同的供应商，因为他们更忠诚于我们，并提供更好的支持，当我们打电话给他们说，我们有几百个他们的系统，他们需要现在修复这一点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|859823|我们也倾向于尽可能地购买相同的型号--部件更具有互操作性，如果我们有100个部件，那么很容易延长一些系统的寿命。|859824|在服务器方面，我们倾向于坚持戴尔和孙。戴尔通常是最好的每个核心价格，他们有一个很好的说唱，在4小时内获得零件，加上技术，如果必要的话。然而，它们的构建质量和可靠性有时仍有很多不足之处。坦率地说，如果我们能够在任何一点上买得起Sun硬件，我们会更喜欢它，因为它的构建质量更高，而且它们的存储产品的价格和功能密度惊人，竞争对手的价格是竞争对手的几倍。我们拒绝在我们的图片中添加IBM、HP和单独的仅存储厂商，即使他们已经拥有了引人注目的产品，因为我们更愿意使用我们已经拥有的两个供应商的产品。戴尔和Sun都提供了很好的工具来管理你的库存和支持合同。据我所知，惠普并没有，至少通过我们购买的经销商。(惠普本身并不是我工作场所的认可供应商。我们必须通过经销商购买产品。)|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

Typically single vendor. Where we have a special application, or can get a higher quality vendor in for the same price, we'll go dual vendor -- but ONLY dual. Desktops we keep all the same vendor, because they're more loyal to us and provide better support when we ring them up and say that we have several hundred of their systems and they need to fix this now. 

We also tend to buy the same model for as long as we can -- parts are more interoperable and it's easy to extend the life of some systems past the warranty if we have 100 to pull parts from. 

Server-wise, we tend to stick with Dell and Sun. Dell is the best per-core price usually, and they have a good rap for getting parts here within 4 hours, plus tech if necessary. However, their build quality and reliability sometimes leaves much to be desired. Frankly, we prefer Sun hardware if we can afford it at any one point because the build quality is higher and their storage products have amazing density for the price as well as features that competitors charge several times as much for. We've resisted adding IBM, HP, and individual storage-only vendors to our picture even when they've had compelling products because we'd rather stick with products from the two vendors we already have. Dell and Sun both provide great tools to manage your inventory and support contracts. HP does not as far as I know, at least through the reseller that we buy through. (HP themselves is not an approved vendor for my workplace. We have to buy products through a reseller.)

Hypothetical:

<ul>
<li>The specs and hardware are the exact same between two machines, but one brand is, Dell for example, and the other is, Sony.</li>
<li>The Sony is X dollars more expensive </li>
</ul>

They should both run Windows the same..., the only differences being body design, right? Brand loyalty when running identical builds of Linux/Windows on identical machines should mean nothing?

Buying new machines: brand loyalty

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

假设：规格和硬件是完全相同的两台机器，但其中一个品牌是戴尔，另一个是索尼。索尼的X美元更贵他们都应该运行相同的Windows .，唯一的区别是身体设计，对吧？当在相同的机器上运行相同的Linux/Windows版本时，品牌忠诚度应该没有任何意义吗？

问购买新机器:品牌忠诚度
EN

回答 8

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问购买新机器:品牌忠诚度EN

回答 8

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问购买新机器:品牌忠诚度
EN