blocks|key|1545488|text|主办的实际费用是：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545489|电源|unordered-list-item|1545490|带宽|1545491|管理盒子的人|1545492|备份|1545493|硬件和软件摊销真实，很快。|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|D|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$]]

The real costs in hosting are:

<ul>
<li>Power</li>
<li>Bandwidth</li>
<li>People to manage the box</li>
<li>Backups</li>
</ul>

Hardware and software amortize real, real quick.

blocks|key|1545693|text|是的，windows许可证需要钱，而windows服务器+(某些类型的微软软件开发所必需的，例如SharePoint)要花费更多。硬件也是如此(但在linux上硬件也不是免费的)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1545694|windows非服务器盒的托管能力是有限制的。如果需要IIS，请记住这一点。另外，请记住，微软提供他们的许多产品的开发版本，以大大降低成本(不要购买完整的版本，直到你结束销售，以证明它的合理性)。|1545695|您需要IDE还是命令行构建？免费？还是付钱？|1545696|1545697|你需要数据库吗？什么类型的？免费的？+Server？服务器的哪个版本？|1545698|如果你在销售软件，MySQL并不总是最好的选择。突然间，“免费”的关系数据库管理系统带来了每年和天价的费用。|1545699|那么，要回答您的question...are那里隐藏的成本？那得看情况。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/windows-server/2008-r2-editions.aspx|1|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/78f4aasd%2528v=VS.100%2529.aspx|2|http://www.microsoft.com/express|3|http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions|4|http://www.mysql.com/|5|http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321185^0|I|A|0|0|0|8|5|1|E|2|2|H|5|3|0|0|E|4|4|Q|9|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@$A|16|B|17|1|18]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@$A|1B|B|1C|1|1D]|$A|1E|B|1F|1|1G]|$A|1H|B|1I|1|1J]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@$A|1M|B|1N|1|1O]|$A|1P|B|1Q|1|1R]]|C|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|U]]|V|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|W]]|X|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|Y]]|Z|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|10]]|11|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|12]]|13|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|14]]]]

Yes a windows license costs money, a <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/windows-server/2008-r2-editions.aspx" rel="nofollow">windows server</a> (required for some kinds of Microsoft software development, e.g. SharePoint) costs more. So does the hardware (but hardware isn't free on linux either).

There are limits to the hosting abilities of windows non-server boxes. Keep this in mind if you need IIS. Also keep in mind that Microsoft offers development versions of many of their products at a greatly reduced cost (don't buy the full edition until you close a sale to justify it).

Do you need an IDE or <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/78f4aasd%28v=VS.100%29.aspx" rel="nofollow">command line building</a>? <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/express" rel="nofollow">Free</a>? <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/en-us/products/2010-editions" rel="nofollow">Or Paid?</a> 
Do you need a database? What kind? <a href="http://www.mysql.com/" rel="nofollow">Free?</a> SQL Server? <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321185" rel="nofollow">Which version of SQL Server?</a>

If you are selling software, MySQL isn't always the best choice. Suddenly, that "free" RDBMS comes with an annual and sky-high fee.

So, to answer your question...are there hidden costs? It depends.

blocks|key|5280119|text|是的，唯一的软件成本是操作系统。显然，硬件成本在很大程度上取决于需求(托管、维护等)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5280120|基于云的主机提供商支付操作系统许可证。这笔费用在每月的费用中转嫁给你。只有在满足其他需求(可伸缩性、低启动成本等)的情况下，您才应该使用云托管。|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

Yes, the only software cost is the OS. Obviously hardware costs vary hugely dependent on requirments (hosting maintenance ect)

Cloud based hosting the provider pays the OS licence. That cost is then passed on to you in the monthly charges. You should only go with cloud hosting if it meets other requirements (scalability low startup cost ect)

blocks|key|5280250|text|如果每个接触到服务器的人都有MSDN许可证，那么生产服务器的成本，IntegrationIntegrationTest&Development服务器可以根据MSDN的条款获得许可。构建服务器作为生产计算，因此需要单独授权。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5280251|因此，要有一个MS开发环境，您需要：-|5280252|如果您想要冗余，至少有3个Windows+Server许可证(一个用于生产，一个用于Server，一个用于构建)可能更多。|unordered-list-item|5280253|为每个开发人员提供一个Visual+%2B+MSDN许可证(我相信承包商拥有自己的MSDN和附加到您的服务器是可以的)|5280254|为每个测试人员提供一个MSDN+(可能涉及测试套件)|5280255|一个用于管理DB+&/或服务器的系统管理员的MSDN|5280256|用于附加到Server的内部用户的CALs|5280257|Sharepoint的额外的额外..。|5280258|如果您想要企业支持，Linux并不是免费的，MySQL也不是免费的。你可以通过一个完全免费的堆栈，只购买你觉得有价值的东西，比如IDE，支持等等。|5280259|对于一个非常小的公司来说，MS许可的初始成本可能是一个问题，然而，作为一个开发团队的雇用成本的百分比，这是相当适度的。|5280260|你走哪条路可能取决于你所在的程序员的可用性。|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|F|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|F|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|F|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|W|$]]

There's the cost of the production server, Integration, Test &amp; Development servers can be licensed under the terms of MSDN if EVERYONE that touches the server has an MSDN licence. Build servers count as production so need to be licensed separately.

So, to have a MS development environment you need:- 

<ul>
<li>At least 3 Windows Server licences (one for production, one for SQL Server &amp; one for build) probably more if you want redundancy.</li>
<li>One Visual Studio + MSDN licence for every developer (I believe it's OK for contractors to have their own MSDN &amp; attach to your servers)</li>
<li>One MSDN (probably involving the Test suite) for every tester</li>
<li>One MSDN for any sysadmins that administer the DB &amp;/or servers</li>
<li>CALs for internal users that attach to SQL Server</li>
</ul>

Sharepoint's extra Team Foundation Server's extra...

Linux isn't free if you want enterprise support, neither is MySQL. You can get away with a completely free stack and only buy things that you feel add value e.g. IDE, support etc.

For a very small company the initial cost of the MS licencing is probably an issue, however, as a percentage of the employment costs of a team of developers it's pretty modest. 

Which way you go probably comes down to availability of programmers where you are.

blocks|key|5280415|text|这是我从关于MS许可的培训中所记得的。这可能不是100%25正确的，但我相信它是接近的：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5280416|在MS软件的情况下，它比看起来更复杂。许可证不一定足够。与许多其他公司一样，MS也使用客户端访问许可证(，CAL)=您必须为访问服务器的每个客户端付费。|5280417|在处理CALs时，可以有多个选项：|5280418|每个用户CAL+-每个经过身份验证的用户必须有自己的CAL。|unordered-list-item|5280419|每个设备CAL+-每个连接设备必须有自己的CAL。|5280420|外部连接器-通常用于互联网，您不为每个认证用户付费，而只是为每个人购买(一些非常昂贵的)许可证。匿名用户不应该需要外部连接器。|5280421|特例|5280422|每个处理器许可证不要求终端用户使用CAL(例如，SQL+server)。|5280423|特殊的服务器类型不需要CALs+(例如2008)|5280424|5280425|更多关于CALs的信息。CALs最常见的购买方式是一些批量许可计划，因为它大大降低了它们的价格。|offset|length|5280426|以下是一些例子：|5280427|您加入一家公司，在那里您将使用运行Windows+7+Enterprise+%2B+Office+2010的桌面计算机。您还将使用MS和。你需要：|5280428|Windows+7企业许可证|5280429|Office+2010许可证|5280430|CAL许可证用于Windows，因为MS+Exchange和MS+Sharepoint都运行在Windows上(每个产品可以使用一个CAL用户调用连接到产品=>的每个实例，如果您需要连接到单个Windows或公司内的100个Windows服务器，则CAL的价格是相同的)。|5280431|CAL交换许可证|5280432|共享点CAL许可证|5280433|用于Sharepoint的SQL服务器必须使用每个处理器的许可，否则您还需要对SQL+server使用CAL。|5280434|CAL的价格因服务器版本的不同而不同，因此企业版CALs比标准版本的CALs昂贵得多。|5280435|另一个例子是：|5280436|您希望运行承载业务应用程序的Windows，该应用程序内部连接到MS和MS。应用程序要求用户进行身份验证。你需要：|5280437|Windows应用程序服务器、CRM和SQL许可证|5280438|CRM许可证|5280439|每个处理器SQL许可证|5280440|Windows服务器企业外部连接器|5280441|用于CRM的外部连接器，因为您向外部用户公开了CRM的信息。|5280442|因此，正如您所看到的，每个应用程序和需求的许可成本可能是非常不同的。重要的是，只有在您负责许可证的服务器上承载应用程序时，这些成本才会困扰您。在共享托管/+VS托管/或云中，情况不应该是这样的，因为您支付了托管计划的费用，这应该已经为SW提供了正确的许可。|5280443|编辑:也有可能，托管公司有不同的许可选项。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/client-access-license.aspx^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|1|1|1|0|4|4|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|24|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|25|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|26|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|27|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|H|7|28|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|H|7|29|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|H|7|2A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|H|7|2B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|H|7|2C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|2D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|2E|8|@]|9|@$V|2F|W|2G|1|2H]]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|2I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|6|7|2J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|H|7|2K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|H|7|2L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|16|5|H|7|2M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|18|5|H|7|2N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|19|3|1A|5|H|7|2O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1B|3|1C|5|H|7|2P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1D|3|1E|5|6|7|2Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1F|3|1G|5|6|7|2R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1H|3|1I|5|6|7|2S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1J|3|1K|5|H|7|2T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1L|3|1M|5|H|7|2U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1N|3|1O|5|H|7|2V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1P|3|1Q|5|H|7|2W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1R|3|1S|5|H|7|2X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1T|3|1U|5|6|7|2Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1V|3|1W|5|6|7|2Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|1X|$1Y|$5|1Z|20|21|A|$22|23]]]]

This is what I remember from training about MS licensing. It is probably not be 100% correct but I believe it is close:

In case of MS Software it is more complicated than it looks like. MS Windows Server license doesn't have to be enough. MS as many other companies also uses client access licenses (CAL) = you must pay for every client accessing to your server. 

When dealing with CALs you can have multiple options:

<ul>
<li>Per user CAL - each authenticated user must have his own CAL</li>
<li>Per device CAL - each connecting device must have its own CAL</li>
<li>External connector - usually for Internet where you don't pay for every authenticated user but simply buy (some very expensive) license for everyone. External connector should not be needed for anonymous users.</li>
<li>Special cases
<ul>
<li>Per processor licenses don't require CALs for end users (for example SQL server)</li>
<li>Special server types don't require CALs (for example Windows Web Server 2008)</li>
</ul></li>
</ul>

More about <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/client-access-license.aspx" rel="nofollow">CALs</a>. CALs are most commonly purchased in some Volume licensing plans because it reduces their price a lot.

Some example how it can be:

You join a company where you will use your desktop machine running Windows 7 Enterprise + Office 2010. You will also use MS Exchange and MS Sharepoint. You need:

<ul>
<li>License for Windows 7 Enterprise</li>
<li>License for Office 2010</li>
<li>CAL License for Windows Server because both MS Exchange and MS Sharepoint are running on Windows Server (one CAL user call per product can be used to connect to every instance of the product => the price of CAL is same if you need to connect to single Windows Server or to 100 Windows Servers within company).</li>
<li>CAL License for Exchange</li>
<li>CAL License for Sharepoint</li>
<li>SQL server used for Sharepoint must use per processor licensing or you will also need CAL to SQL server</li>
</ul>

Price of CALs differs per server version so CALs for Enterprise versions are much more expensive than CALs for Standard versions.

Another example:

You want to run Windows Server hosting your business application which internally connects to MS CRM and MS SQL. The application requires user to authenticate. You need:

<ul>
<li>Windows Server license for App Server, CRM and SQL</li>
<li>CRM license</li>
<li>Per processor SQL license</li>
<li>External connector for Windows Server Enterprise</li>
<li>External connector for CRM because you exposing information from CRM to external users</li>
</ul>

So as you can see the licensing costs can be very different per application and requirements. The important is that these costs should bother you only if you host the application on the servers where you are responsible for licenses. In shared hosting / VS hosting / or cloud it should not be the case because you pay for hosting plan which should already offer you SW with correct licensing.

Edit: There is also possibility that hosting companies have different licensing options.

blocks|key|5280200|text|这是房间的成本，也是冷却房间的费用。看看服务器的规格，找出最大耗电量，乘以每千瓦/小时的电价，然后乘以一段时间，比如说一年，以获得运行成本。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5280201|您需要考虑硬件故障和替换，这可能是硬盘故障。|5280202|不管操作系统是什么，这些成本都是相同的--操作系统选择之间的唯一区别是授权成本和获得熟练员工的成本。|5280203|云从规模经济中受益，所以如果你有一个小的设置，你可以节省一些钱去云端。但总有一天，你的规模如此之大，你可以获得同样的规模经济，从而节省云供应商的利润率。|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

There is the cost of the room that it is in, as well as cooling that room. Look at the specs for the server and find the max power usage and multiply that by the electricity price per Kw/H then multiply that by a period of time, say a year to get that running cost.

You need to allow for hardware failures and replacements as well, this will probably be hard drive failures.

These costs are the same irrespective of OS - the only difference between OS choices is licensing cost and the cost of getting skilled staff.

The cloud benefits from economies of scale, so if you have a small set-up you may save some money going to the cloud. But there will come a point where your size is such that you can get the same economies of scale and hence save on the cloud vendors profit margin.

I want to know what is the cost of running a Windows Application Server.

I know the cost of running a Linux server with Java based Application Server is probably zero. 

What is the cost of running a windows based server on which all Apps are written in C#? I assume is is just the license cost of a copy of Windows Server. 

Is this true? Are there any other hidden cost for hosting with WIndows? 

I think with Cloud based hosting, these license costs can be avoided then.

The cost of running a Windows App Server

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我想知道运行的成本是多少。我知道使用基于Java的Application运行Linux服务器的成本可能为零。运行所有应用程序都是用C#编写的基于windows的服务器的成本是多少？我认为这仅仅是Windows副本的许可成本。这是真的吗？使用WIndows托管还有其他隐藏成本吗？我认为，通过基于云的托管，这些许可成本可以避免。

问运行的成本
EN

回答 6

Software Engineering用户

Software Engineering用户

Software Engineering用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问运行的成本EN

回答 6

Software Engineering用户

Software Engineering用户

Software Engineering用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问运行的成本
EN