WPS。将消息输出转换为“人类可读的”
WPS。将消息输出转换为“人类可读的”
提问于 2017-01-02 22:55:13
我想在家里测试我的路由器的无线网络安全性。它激活了WPS。我知道WPS应该停用，我只是在测试.
Reaver正在“吐痰”大量的信息，问题是：
所有这些信息的意义是什么？
这是一种有效的连接：
[+] Waiting for beacon from XX:XX:XX:...
[+] Associated with XX:XX:XX... (ESSID: WifiTesting)
[+] Trying pin 12345670
[+] Sending EAPOL START request
[+] Received identity request
[+] Sending identity response
[+] Received M1 message
[+] Sending M2 message
[+] Received M3 message
[+] Sending M4 message
[+] Received M5 message
[+] Sending M6 message
[+] Received M7 message
[+] Sending WSC NACK
[+] Sending WSC NACK
[+] Pin cracked in 6 seconds为什么有时它会忽略错误消息呢？他们是什么意思？
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x02), re-trying last pin
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x03), re-trying last pin
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x04), re-trying last pin回答 1
Security用户
回答已采纳
发布于 2017-01-02 23:27:46
一个非常简短的答案可以是：
[+] Waiting for beacon from XX:XX:XX:... -> searching for Access Point
[+] Associated with XX:XX:XX:... (ESSID: WifiTesting) -> Connected by radio
[+] Trying pin 12345670 -> Testing PIN
[+] Sending EAPOL START request
[+] Received identity request
[+] Sending identity response
[+] Received M1 message -> Router sends its identity / public key
[+] Sending M2 message -> The client sends its identity / public key
[+] Received M3 message
[+] Sending M4 message
[+] Received M5 message -> Confirmed, PIN1 is correct
[+] Sending M6 message
[+] Received M7 message -> Confirmed, PIN2 is correct
[+] Sending WSC NACK -> The client closes communication because it's finished
[+] Sending WSC NACK
[+] Pin cracked in 7 seconds -> The program says the final complete PIN对于错误：
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x02), re-trying last pin -> no response from AP, timeout
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x03), re-trying last pin -> incorrect packets order, no right answer, usually on M1 or M3
[!] WPS transaction failed (code: 0x04), re-trying last pin -> AP doesn't want to speak with you :)要理解这一点，您必须知道PIN被分为两部分(最后数字的校验和)。请阅读以下有关WPS是如何工作的的有趣信息。这里解释了WPS所涉及的三个逻辑组件，我从中提取了一个图像：
这是合乎逻辑的，在像您这样的普通家庭场景中，路由器(注册员角色)通常与AP相同。
希望这能有所帮助
页面原文内容由Security提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接：
https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/147052
复制相关文章
相似问题
腾讯云开发者
