即使我在ReasonML中使用相同的类型,我也收到类型不匹配的消息。错误是:
[1] We've found a bug for you!
[1] /Users/gt/work/real-and-open/frontend/src/domain/classroom/views/RosterLayoutHeader.re 42:10-70
[1]
[1] 40 ┆ <Classroom.Mutation.AddStudent>
[1] 41 ┆ ...{
[1] 42 ┆ (addStudent: (~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit) =>
[1] {
[1] 43 ┆ <div>
[1] 44 ┆ <StudentRowHeader
[1]
[1] This pattern matches values of type
[1] (~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit
[1] but a pattern was expected which matches values of type
[1] AddStudent.ContainerMutation.mutationFunctionType (defined as
[1] AddStudent.MutationInternals.mutationFunctionType)当我用addStudent: AddStudent.MutationInternals.mutationFunctionType替换addStudent: (~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit时
错误变为:
[1] We've found a bug for you!
[1] /Users/gt/work/real-and-open/frontend/src/domain/classroom/views/RosterLayoutHeader.re 53:61-70
[1]
[1] 51 ┆ _ =>
[1] 52 ┆ updateClassroom(
[1] 53 ┆ Classroom.Action.ApolloAddStudent(() => addStudent(
[1] 54 ┆ ~id=classroom.local.newStudentId |> Student.Model.getUUIDFromId,
[1] 55 ┆ ~classroomId=classroom.data.id,
[1]
[1] This expression has type AddStudent.MutationInternals.mutationFunctionType
[1] It is not a function.在代码中,AddStudent如下所示:
[@bs.config {jsx: 3}];
module Mutation = [%graphql
{|
mutation addStudent($id: ID!, $classroomId: ID!) {
addStudent(student: {id: $id, classroomId: $classroomId}){
...Classroom_Model.Fragment.ClassroomFields
}
}
|}
];
module MutationInternals : ApolloMutation.MutationInternal = {
type mutationFunctionType = (~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit;
let componentName = "AddStudent";
module Config = Mutation;
module InternalMutation = ReasonApollo.CreateMutation(Config);
let callMutationWithApollo = (apolloMutation : ApolloMutation.apolloMutationType(Config.t)) =>
((~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, ()): unit => {
let newStudent = Config.make(~id, ~classroomId, ());
apolloMutation(
~variables=newStudent##variables,
// ~refetchQueries=[|"member"|],
// ~optimisticResponse=Config.t,
(),
) |> ignore;
() |> ignore;
}: mutationFunctionType);
};
module ContainerMutation = ApolloMutation.CreateMutationContainer(MutationInternals);
module Jsx2 = ContainerMutation.Jsx2;
let make = ContainerMutation.make;所以请注意3件事
1)类型:此处引用了type mutationFunctionType = (~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit;,错误中显示AddStudent.MutationInternals.mutationFunctionType与(~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit不匹配,尽管它们是相同的。
2)当我在调用函数中直接引用该类型时,它告诉我mutationFunctionType不是一个函数,而是一个函数。
3)我正在使用一个函数器来处理我的MutationInternals模块...我想知道这是否会影响类型。
谢谢
发布于 2019-07-24 02:06:18
AddStudent.MutationInternals.mutationFunctionType类型是抽象的,编译器不知道它实际上是作为类型的函数实现的
(~id: UUID.t, ~classroomId: UUID.t, unit) => unit很难猜测,你的情况下问题的根源是什么。你可以通过封装你的模块意外地过度抽象你的代码,或者你试图破坏必要的抽象。在任何情况下,编译器都会阻止您这样做。
通常,这种类型的错误发生在您密封模块时,例如,当您添加模块类型时,例如,
module type S = {type t};
module M : S = { type t = int};这使得M.t类型变得抽象,因此它不能在期望int的上下文中使用。解决方案是移除这种不必要的密封,例如,
module type S = {type t};
module M = { type t = int};或者明确地告诉编译器,t不是抽象类型,而是具体的int,例如,
module type S = {type t};
module M: S with type t = int = {
type t = int;
};请注意,在您的示例中,我讨论的是这段代码
MutationInternals : ApolloMutation.MutationInternal它隐藏了mutationFunctionType定义。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57169497
复制相似问题