首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
精选内容/技术社群/优惠产品,尽在小程序
立即前往
  • 您找到你想要的搜索结果了吗?
    是的
    没有找到

    Why does FUSE on Android suck?

    Introduction FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace) is a very useful mechanism in many applications. The thing is, those applications should not be focused on performance in terms of actual data transfers. FUSE has many advantages implied by userspace sandboxing, but for sure performance wasn't the main design consideration. I'm not telling that it is a bad design or something wrong with FUSE itself. It is just focused on other aspects like security, stability and easiness of creating applications. The problem I'd like to discuss here is that Google decided to use FUSE as a frontend to actual data stored on the non-volatile memory. FUSE has been introduced in Android 4.4 to handle "emulated" storage. Before that, "emulated" storage path was mounted as VFAT. Here's how it looked on old ICS (output of mount command):

    01

    测试用 - 4.使用eBPF逃逸容器技术分析与实践

    容器安全是一个庞大且牵涉极广的话题,而容器的安全隔离往往是一套纵深防御的体系,牵扯到 AppArmor、Namespace、Capabilities、Cgroup、Seccomp 等多项内核技术和特性,但安全却是一处薄弱则全盘皆输的局面,一个新的内核特性可能就会让看似无懈可击的防线存在突破口。随着云原生技术的快速发展,越来越多的容器运行时组件在新版本中会默认配置 AppArmor 策略,原本我们在《红蓝对抗中的云原生漏洞挖掘及利用实录》介绍的多种容器逃逸手法会逐渐失效;因此我们希望能碰撞出一些攻击手法,进而突破新版本容器环境的安全能力,并使用更契合容器集群的新方式把 “任意文件写” 转化为“远程代码执行”,从而提前布防新战场。

    06

    扫码

    添加站长 进交流群

    领取专属 10元无门槛券

    手把手带您无忧上云

    扫码加入开发者社群

    热门标签

    活动推荐

      运营活动

      活动名称
      广告关闭
      领券