首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >专栏 >Scalaz(22)- 泛函编程思维: Coerce Monadic Thinking

Scalaz(22)- 泛函编程思维: Coerce Monadic Thinking

作者头像
用户1150956
发布2018-01-05 10:28:00
4610
发布2018-01-05 10:28:00
举报

马上进入新的一年2016了,来点轻松点的内容吧。前面写过一篇关于用Reader实现依赖注入管理的博文(Scalaz(16)- Monad:依赖注入-Dependency Injection By Reader Monad)。刚好年底这几天抽空重审了一遍,这时才真正认识到让一个老资格OOP程序猿去编写一段FP程序时会发生什么事情:他会用FP语法和数据类型按照OOP的思维编写程序。其结果就是一段尴尬的代码,让人看得不知怎么去形容,更不用提FP程序的精简高雅了。我在前面博文的示范程序正是落入了这个OOP思维陷阱。

我们先把源代码搬过来看看:

package Exercises
import scalaz._
import Scalaz._
object reader3 {
trait OnOffDevice {
    def on: String
    def off: String
}
trait SensorDevice {
    def isCoffeePresent: Boolean
}
trait PowerConfig {
  def getPowerVolts(country: String): Int
  def isUSStandard(volt: Int): Boolean
}

trait OnOffComponent {
    def onOffDevice: OnOffDevice
}
trait SensorComponent {
    def sensorDevice: SensorDevice
}
trait Device extends OnOffComponent with SensorComponent
trait DeviceComponent {
    def onOffDevice: OnOffDevice
    def sensorDevice: SensorDevice
}
trait PowerComponent {
    def powerConfig: PowerConfig
}
trait Appliance extends DeviceComponent with PowerComponent
object Appliance {
  val appliance = Reader[Appliance,Appliance](identity)
  val onOffDevice = appliance map {_.onOffDevice}
  val sensorDevice = appliance map {_.sensorDevice}
  val powerConfig = appliance map {_.powerConfig}
}
object OnOffDevice {
import Appliance.onOffDevice
    def on: Reader[Appliance,String] = onOffDevice map { _.on }
    def off: Reader[Appliance,String] = onOffDevice map { _.off }
}
object SensorDevice {
import Appliance.sensorDevice
  def isCoffeePresent: Reader[Appliance,Boolean] = sensorDevice map { _.isCoffeePresent }
}
object PowerConfig {
import Appliance.powerConfig
    def getPowerVolts(country: String) = powerConfig map {_.getPowerVolts(country)}
    def isUSStandard(volts: Int) = powerConfig map {_.isUSStandard(volts)}
}
object OnOffService {
    def on = for {
        ison <- OnOffDevice.on
    } yield ison
    def off = for {
        isoff <- OnOffDevice.off
    } yield isoff
}
object SensorService {
    def isCoffeePresent = for {
        hasCoffee <- SensorDevice.isCoffeePresent
    } yield hasCoffee
}
object PowerService {
    def isUSStandard(country: String) = for {
        is110v <- PowerConfig.getPowerVolts(country)
        isUSS <- PowerConfig.isUSStandard(is110v)
    } yield isUSS
}
class OnOffDeviceImpl extends OnOffDevice {
    def on = "SomeDevice.On"
    def off = "SomeDevice.Off"
}
class SensorDeviceImpl extends SensorDevice {
    def isCoffeePresent = true
}
class PowerConfigImpl extends PowerConfig {
    def getPowerVolts(country: String) = country match {
        case "USA" => 110
        case "UK" => 220
        case "HK" => 220
        case "CHN" => 110
        case _  => 0
    }
    def isUSStandard(volts: Int) = volts === 110
}
object MockOnOffDevice extends OnOffDeviceImpl
object MockSensorDevice extends SensorDeviceImpl
object MockPowerConfig extends PowerConfigImpl
trait OnOffFunctions extends OnOffComponent {
    def onOffDevice = MockOnOffDevice
}
trait SensorFunctions extends SensorComponent {
  def sensorDevice = MockSensorDevice
}
trait DeviceFunctions extends DeviceComponent  {
    def onOffDevice = MockOnOffDevice
  def sensorDevice = MockSensorDevice
}
trait PowerFunctions extends PowerComponent {
    def powerConfig = MockPowerConfig
}
object MockAppliance extends Appliance with DeviceFunctions with PowerFunctions
def trigger =
  if ((PowerService.isUSStandard("CHN")(MockAppliance))
      && (SensorService.isCoffeePresent(MockAppliance)))
       OnOffService.on(MockAppliance)
   else
     OnOffService.off(MockAppliance)              //> trigger: => scalaz.Id.Id[String]
trigger                                           //> res0: scalaz.Id.Id[String] = SomeDevice.On
}

这段代码前面用trait进行了功能需求描述,接着用Reader定义依赖,再接着通过Reader组合实现了依赖的层级式管理,直到形成最终的Reader组合:

object MockAppliance extends Appliance with DeviceFunctions with PowerFunctions

这些都没什么问题,也体现了函数式编程风格。问题就出在这个trigger函数定义里,我们来看看:

def trigger =
  if ((PowerService.isUSStandard("CHN")(MockAppliance))
      && (SensorService.isCoffeePresent(MockAppliance)))
       OnOffService.on(MockAppliance)
   else
     OnOffService.off(MockAppliance)              //> trigger: => scalaz.Id.Id[String]

首先感觉代码很乱;每句都有个MockAppliance很笨拙(clumsy),感觉不到任何优雅的风格,也看不出与常用的OOP编程有什么分别。

回忆下当时是怎么想的呢?trigger的要求是:如果电源是US标准并且壶里能检测到有咖啡,那么就可以启动加热器,否则关停。

已经完成了电源标准和咖啡壶内容检测即加热器开关的组件(combinators)。都是细化了的独立功能函数,这点符合了函数式编程的基本要求。

当时的思路是这样的:

1、获取当前电源制式,判断是否US标准 

2、获取咖啡壶检测数据,判断是否盛载咖啡

3、if 1 and 2 then OnoffService.on else OnOffService.off

但是为了获取1和2的Boolean结果就必须注入依赖:MockAppliance,所以在trigger函数定义里进行了依赖注入。现在看来这就是典型的OOP思想方式。

首先我们再次回想一下函数式编程的一些最基本要求:

1、纯代码(pure code):实现函数组合-这点在前面的功能函数组件编程中已经做到

2、无副作用(no-side-effect):尽量把副作用推到程序最外层,拖延到最后-trigger使用了依赖MockAppliance,产生了副作用

3、我经常提醒自己Monadic Programming就是F[A]:A是我们要运算的值,我们需要在一个壳子内(context)对A进行运算。

看看这个版本的trigger:因为直接获取了isUSStandard和isCoffeePresent的Boolean运算值所以需要立即注入依赖。首先的后果是trigger现在是有副作用的了。再者trigger和MockAppliance紧紧绑到了一起(tight coupling)- 如果我们再有个Reader组合,比如什么DeployAppliance的,那我们必须再搞另一个版本的trigger了。即使我们通过输入参数传入这个Reader组合依赖也会破坏了函数的可组合性(composibility),影响函数组件的重复利用。看来还是按照上面的要求把这个trigger重新编写:

  object MockAppliance extends Appliance with DeviceFunctions with PowerFunctions
  def trigger(cntry: String) = for {
    isUS <- PowerService.isUSStandard(cntry)
    hasCoffee <- SensorService.isCoffeePresent
    onoff <- if (isUS && hasCoffee) OnOffService.on else OnOffService.off
  } yield onoff       //> trigger: (cntry: String)scalaz.Kleisli[scalaz.Id.Id,Exercises.Exercises.rea
                                                  //| derDI.Appliance,String]
  trigger("CHN")(MockAppliance)                   //> res0: scalaz.Id.Id[String] = SomeDevice.On
  trigger("HK")(MockAppliance)                    //> res1: scalaz.Id.Id[String] = SomeDevice.Off

现在这个版本的trigger是一段纯代码,并且是在for-comprehension内运算的,与依赖实现了松散耦合。假如这时再有另一个版本的依赖组合DeployAppliance,我们只需要改变trigger的注入依赖:

  trigger("CHN")(DeployAppliance)                   //> res0: scalaz.Id.Id[String] = CoffeeMachine.On
  trigger("HK")(DeployAppliance)                    //> res1: scalaz.Id.Id[String] = CoffeeMachine.Off

怎么样?这样看起来是不是简明高雅许多了?

噢,祝大家新年快乐!

本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划,分享自作者个人站点/博客。
原始发表:2015-12-30 ,如有侵权请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除

本文分享自 作者个人站点/博客 前往查看

如有侵权,请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除。

本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划  ,欢迎热爱写作的你一起参与!

评论
登录后参与评论
0 条评论
热度
最新
推荐阅读
领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档