为什么C++不会衰老

Thoughts about C++ in the modern world. 一些关于当代C++的思考。

Debates about the present state of C++ in the programming world divide the participants into two camps: some dislike C++ and predict it’s soon death, while others believe that it will persist as it has before. I’d say the truth lies somewhere in the middle but that would mean that C++’s condition is kind of uncertain, like it was between the releases of C++03 and C++11. But it’s not actually so. How exactly then? Let’s try to figure this out. 在编程的世界中,关于C++当前状况的讨论分成两个阵营:一些不喜欢C ++,并预测它很快就死亡,而另一些人认为,这将持续,如以前一样。我说的是事实介于两种观点之间,但是这将意味着,C ++的病情是一种不确定的,就像是C ++03和C++ 11的版本之间。究竟如何呢?让我们揣摩吧。

Is it the beginning of the end?

Nothing of the kind. Sure, C++ is probably not so popular as C# and Java among beginner programmers, and industry giants do not release new C++-specific technologies, nor is it promoted by Microsoft and Oracle. But interpreting this as the end of C++ is totally wrong. Software based on C++ is still in use and needs support. Most of new software such as game engines is built with (/extensively uses) C++. C++11 and C++14, as well as C++17 which is coming out soon, only prove that C++ is doing well. But first things first.

C++11, C++14, C++17…

As mentioned previously, C++ was in a somewhat “uncertain” condition between C++11 and C++03 releases. Old libraries such as boost, Qt, etc. Were developing and improving and a new library C++/CLI was released, while there still was no sign of the new official standard.

Things went that way for a long time, but anyway the new C++11 standard was released in 2011 instead of 2009 as it had been planned. However, it was finally released and brought many additions, extensions, and syntactic sugar. It made the language much easier to code in ; the standard library was expanded with many things to make the programming process easier. A lot of new features were introduced: official support of parallel programming, initialization lists to make the code clearer, lambda functions, and much more. But there is no need to discuss all of that here because the article is not about that.

OK, we have the C++11 standard, that’s great. But what’s next? Stagnation for another 8 years? No way. It is not a secret that C++14 has already been released. It is hard to compare C++11’s and C++14’s innovations (/It isn’t as innovative as C++14), but it still has brought some additions and improvements.

It is very important that this trend is sustained and there are already some outlines of the new C++17 standard.

Of course, it will be a long time before programmers fully understand all the benefits of the new standards and learn to use the innovations properly. Yet these innovations are sure to have a positive effect on the quality of the code and software.

And what about existing software?

Existing software There is a large amount of software built with C++. Of course, we need to support it. Do you want to look at real-life examples? Please, check this list. You will surely (/Bet you’ll) find many well-known products there. I don’t believe that anyone will take up the job of rewriting all the existing C++ code into C# or Java just because it will be easier to work with in future, and because of the garbage collectors, and so on. It appears that knowledge of C++ is still urgent. Considering that C++ has become much more convenient to work with, the idea of using it to write modules/applications does not sound crazy. It will be much easier to support such code later. At the same time, it is the same high-performance C++as it used to be, but extended with a huge variety of new features. The extended standard library will also give us an opportunity to use ready-made solutions instead of creating them anew.

Popularity among beginners

From this viewpoint, things are not so good with C++. It is not much popular among beginner programmers who prefer C# or Java instead. Why? There are several reasons:

High language learning difficulty

Every programmer knows that C++ is difficult. Yes, it is vast and there are a lot of peculiarities. But what do we get in return? High performance + absolute control of all the processes (especially in original C). Again, we cannot but mention the C++11 standard with its improved user-friendliness, easy syntax, various containers, algorithms, and other useful things designed to make programmers’ life and job easier.

However, you still can shoot yourself in the foot, though the probability of this has been greatly reduced.

Low promotion

It is not a secret for anyone that C# and Java are aggressively promoted by Microsoft and Oracle. I am not sure about Java, for I’m not very much into the current trends there, but promotion by Microsoft is very evident. Most Microsoft innovations are tailored specifically for C# and their hackathons use C# too. I’m not saying it’s bad, I’m just stating the fact .

There is no support like that for C++. Sure, there is a variety of tools released specifically for it to make the workflow and the development process easier. Among these, we should mention Qt and ReSharper C++ recently released by JetBrains. Visual Studio 2015 now provides support for some of the innovations of the latest standards plus some new additional features that have made the workflow easier.

Nevertheless, it can’t compare to C#’s and Java’s scope of promotion.

Specialization

In spite of the fact that C++ is a very rich and flexible language, its scope of use is pretty narrow. Competitors contribute to this, too. Let’s look at a real-life example - mobile software development. The major platforms are already occupied by specific languages: Windows Phone by C#, Android by Java, iOS by Objective-C. That doesn’t mean that you can’t use C++ for these platforms. The question is if it will be easy and as efficient. Neither is C++ well suited for web software development which is growing more and more popular every year. Yes, there are means to work with sockets and libraries like Wt. But have you heard much of C++ web applications? Me neither. Considering that mobile and web software development have become a very popular field, it’s no wonder that beginner programmers prefer to learn other languages.

TIOBE Index But it’s all just words, and, as they say, a picture paints a thousand words.

Let’s have a look at the current state of affairs. In this area, the TIOBE index is quite popular: it demonstrates language ratings, rating dynamics in the chart, and other parameters.

As you can see, C++ is in the 3rd place presently, which is better than the last year. Furthermore, it is one of two languages among the top five ones whose rating has increased, even though slightly.

Conclusion I think that you have already formed an opinion of C++’s current state in the modern world. Now let me speak my own.

Shouting that C++ is doing better than ever would be a lie. But even a bigger lie is to call it a “dying” language .

C++ is alive and occupying its own niche.

New standards introduce some innovations making the language easier and more “user-friendly”. Software built with this language is still in use and needs support. C++ is perfectly suited for software development in certain fields, which , together with everything said above, means that C++ is still needed, evolving, and not going to give up.

原文发布于微信公众号 - 程序员的酒和故事(cppdabaojian)

原文发表时间:2016-11-17

本文参与腾讯云自媒体分享计划,欢迎正在阅读的你也加入,一起分享。

发表于

我来说两句

0 条评论
登录 后参与评论

相关文章

来自专栏潇涧技术专栏

Tips about MacBook's battery health

内容摘自Mac上的一个灰常好的免费软件Battery Health中关于保养MacBook的电池寿命的建议,与大家一起分享

451
来自专栏量化投资与机器学习

【前沿】为什么Python是金融产品开发的最佳选择?

How do you nd your way and stay a oat in ntech? This new technology took the w...

742
来自专栏ml

hdu 1829 A Bug's Life(分组并查集(偏移量))

A Bug's Life Time Limit: 15000/5000 MS (Java/Others)    Memory Limit: 32768/3276...

3338
来自专栏ml

HDUOJ-----1066Last non-zero Digit in N!

Last non-zero Digit in N! Time Limit: 2000/1000 MS (Java/Others)    Memory Limit...

3146
来自专栏小樱的经验随笔

Codeforces Round #336 (Div. 2)【A.思维,暴力,B.字符串,暴搜,前缀和,C.暴力,D,区间dp,E,字符串,数学】

A. Saitama Destroys Hotel time limit per test:1 second memory limit per test:256...

3187
来自专栏智能计算时代

deepstream 2.0 outperforms socket.io by more than x 1000

By Wolfram Hempel November 21st 2016 Realtime is growing fast. From collaborativ...

2114
来自专栏小樱的经验随笔

HDU 5882 Balanced Game

Balanced Game Time Limit: 3000/1000 MS (Java/Others)    Memory Limit: 32768/3276...

3419
来自专栏ml

HDUOJ----2487Ugly Windows

Ugly Windows Time Limit: 2000/1000 MS (Java/Others)    Memory Limit: 32768/32768...

2819
来自专栏CreateAMind

Hebbian learning 的实现 Fast Weights

582
来自专栏开发与安全

《dive into python3》 笔记摘录

0、In Python 2, the / operator usually meant integer division, but you could make...

2150

扫码关注云+社区