blocks|key|1537242|text|我个人喜欢XAMPP。我在随身携带的拇指驱动器上运行了一个安装程序，这几乎就是我在任何一台机器上为LAMP+web+dev开发的环境(我主要在Windows客户端机器上)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537243|小巧，功能齐全，稳定--非常适合我的需求。|1537244|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I like XAMPP, personally. I have an install running on a thumbdrive that I carry around that's pretty much my development environment for LAMP web dev on any machine I happen to be at (I'm mostly on Windows client machines).

Small, fully-functional, and stable - works really well for my needs.

blocks|key|1752268|text|我最喜欢WAMP这个真正简单的界面，我可以很容易地在不同版本的PHP5.26/4.44/4.3.9、Apache5/4和Apache2/1.3之间切换|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1752269|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.wampserver.com/en/^0|4|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I like <a href="http://www.wampserver.com/en/" rel="noreferrer">WAMP</a> the best, real simple interface and I can easily switch between different versions of PHP 5.26/4.44/4.3.9, MySQL 5/4, and Apache 2/1.3

blocks|key|1537083|text|XAMPP对于开发和可移植性是有好处的，这一点是肯定的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537084|LAMP在性能和安全性(以及普及性)方面是最好的。|1537085|如果你不想学习WAMP...well，我想这是为你准备的。|1537086|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

XAMPP is good for development and portability, that's for sure. 

LAMP is best for performance and security (and ubiquity).

WAMP...well, that's for if you don't want to learn Linux, I guess.

blocks|key|1537036|text|LAMP似乎是这些选项中最常见的，所以在严格地寻找解决问题的方法时，我会推荐LAMP。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537037|然而，这真的要归结为对你来说是最好的选择。如果您不了解Linux，那么运行一个WAMP安装程序可能会使这个过程更容易维护。尝试将您的经验和服务器所需的维护考虑到您的决策中。|1537038|就我个人而言，我为了我的目的运行了一台LAMP服务器，因为我知道足够多的Linux来维护它，它最终成为了我的目的的最佳解决方案。|1537039|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

LAMP seems to be the most common of those options, so on a strictly find solutions to your problems I would recommend LAMP.

It really comes down to whats going to be the best option for you though. If you don't know Linux than maybe running a WAMP setup will make the process easier to maintain. Try and factor in your experiance and the maintenance required on the server into your decision.

Personally I run a LAMP server for my purposes, as I know enough Linux to maintain it and it ended up being the best solution for my purposes.

blocks|key|1752419|text|我尝试了XAMPP然后放弃了.我遇到了一个反斜杠的问题(寡妇使用正斜杠)..due到这个没有我的脚本可以保存任何文件到文件夹，因为路径将类似于dir1\dir2\+charm..it+/charm..it_folder/image.jpg...我尝试了WAMP它像charm..it一样工作没有抛出错误并且保存图像文件为有意的...所以..我想我将坚持使用WAMP...如果有人能告诉我"madslashes“问题是如何在XAMPP上修复的，我将不胜感激..我用谷歌搜索了furiously..without+luck..thanks|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1752420|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I tried XAMPP and gave up...I faced an issue with backslashes(widows uses forward slashes)..due to this none of my scripts could save any files to folders because the path would be like dir1\dir2\folder/image_folder/image.jpg...I tried WAMP it worked like a charm..it threw no errors and saved the image files as intented...so..I guess I will stick to WAMP...I would appreciate it if someone could tell me how the "madslashes" issue is fixed on XAMPP..I googled furiously..without any luck..thanks

blocks|key|1752092|text|Xampp是一个用于开发的自包含包。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1752093|后两个是安装在服务器gnu/linux或windows+server+2k*上的完整生产堆栈。|1752094|因此，如果您想要一个可以删除的程序安装，请使用xampp进行开发，否则您可以在您的系统上完全安装其中的一个。后者(显然)也将产生更好的性能。|1752095|就标准而言，lamp的行业范围更广，windows服务器倾向于运行IIS而不是apache，尽管这并不意味着他们不能。|1752096|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Xampp is a self contained package for developments.

the latter two would be full production stacks installed on your server either gnu/linux or windows server 2k*

so if you want a one program install that can be removed go with xampp for development, otherwise you can fully install eash of them on your system. the latter will also (obviously) produce greater performance.

as far as standards go, lamp is more industry wide, the windows servers tend to run IIS instead of apache, though it doesn't mean they can't. thier are books on php over windows but i think easy of use and wide adaptation is in the lamp camp.

blocks|key|1751925|text|这完全取决于您愿意管理什么。如果设置得当，这些设置中的任何一个都可以是稳定、健壮和安全的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751926|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

It all depends on what you are comfortable administering. Any of these setups can be stable, robust, and secure if its properly set up.

blocks|key|1537183|text|我使用WAMP已经有一段时间了，从我收集的信息来看，它相当可靠。安装非常简单，用户界面也非常友好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537184|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've been using WAMP for a while now, and from what I've gathered its pretty reliable. The installation is a breeze, and user interface is pretty friendly.

blocks|key|1537671|text|http://www.formboss.net/blog/2010/02/hosting-php-linux-vs-windows-benchmarks/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1537672|他似乎对mysql/apache/php的股票很满意。|1537673|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|25|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|4]]]]

<a href="http://www.formboss.net/blog/2010/02/hosting-php-linux-vs-windows-benchmarks/" rel="nofollow">http://www.formboss.net/blog/2010/02/hosting-php-linux-vs-windows-benchmarks/</a>

He seemed pretty happy with stock mysql/apache/php

blocks|key|1537827|text|使用Wamp，新版本已经预先安装了xdebug，这对我来说很好，因为我第一次尝试安装xdebug时，花了我很长时间的<_<|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537828|我还没有尝试过Xampp，但是看到它没有绑定xdebug，我放弃了尝试:P|1537829|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Using Wamp, the new version has xdebug pre-installed, which is nice for me since the first time I tried to install xdebug, it took me ages &lt;_&lt;

Haven't tried Xampp, but just seeing that it doesn't have xdebug bundled I backed off from trying :P

blocks|key|1537341|text|我在一个项目中使用了WIMP，这没什么可大惊小怪的：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537342|WIMP:+Windows、IIS、MySQL、PHP|1537343|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I use WIMP on a project, and it's ok, not anything to write home about:

WIMP: Windows, IIS, MySQL, PHP

blocks|key|1537549|text|对我来说，这取决于你的专业水平。它们都是伟大而可靠的作品。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537550|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

For me, it depends on your specialization. They are both works great and reliable.

blocks|key|1537744|text|我最喜欢WAMP，直到我尝试卸载它，发现它留下了一大堆垃圾，所以还是使用XAMPP吧。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1537745|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I liked WAMP best until I tried to uninstall it, and realized it left behind a ton of junk, so go with XAMPP.

blocks|key|1752360|text|我使用xampp，因为它提供了简单的可升级性和可移植性。你可以毫不费力地升级版本。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1752361|我使用xampp的7zip安装程序版本，这是一个非常好的，当它来升级你的php和phpmyadmin相当频繁，以修复以前的版本中引入的错误，并具有新的功能。|1752362|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I use xampp, because it offers easy upgradeability and portability. You can easily upgrade the version wihtout a hassle.

I use xampp's 7zip installer version which is a very nice when it comes to be upgrading your php and phpmyadmin quite frequently in order to fix the bugs that are introduced in previous versions and have new functionality.

blocks|key|1752574|text|我喜欢使用xampp+lite作为开发服务器。我只需要拿一台旧电脑，重新安装windows，然后下载并安装。将网卡更改为静态，并在启动时打开Apachie和mysql。它们作为服务运行。我将驱动器设置为共享，当我想使用它时，我将文件复制到htdocs区域，并将浏览器转到该IP。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1752575|非常简单。|1752576|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I like xampp lite for a development server. I just take an old pc, re install windows and download and install. 
Change the Net card to static and turn on Apachie and mysql on startup. They run as services. I set the drive as shared and when I want to use it I copy the files into the htdocs area and turn the browser to that IP. 

Very easy.

We have got loads of options for <code>php + MySQL + Apache</code> combo... Which is the best pack among these ?

Lets confine our ideas to <code>WAMP vs XAMPP</code>, is there a better option to go for?

I created an online programming contest web app called <code>CodeFire</code> on <code>XAMPP</code>, later I had to switch to <code>WAMP</code>, where none of the <code>php</code> scripts worked properly... what standard should I follow?

XAMPP and WAMP in the LAMP, what's the best?

服务器

Windows

MySQL

Linux

我们有很多用于php + MySQL + Apache组合的选项……这些包中哪一包最好？让我们把想法局限在WAMP vs XAMPP上，有没有更好的选择呢？我在XAMPP上创建了一个名为CodeFire的在线编程竞赛web应用，后来我不得不切换到WAMP，在那里php脚本都不能正常工作……我应该遵循什么标准？

问台灯里的XAMPP和WAMP，哪一个最好？
EN

回答 15

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问台灯里的XAMPP和WAMP，哪一个最好？EN

回答 15

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问台灯里的XAMPP和WAMP，哪一个最好？
EN