blocks|key|1331552|text|通常使用Boost，但是如果你使用Qt，他们的QtTestLib可能是更好的选择。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1331553|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/test/doc/html/intro.html|1|http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qttestlib/qtest-overview.html^0|4|5|0|N|9|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

Usually use <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/test/doc/html/intro.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost</a>, but if you are using Qt, their <a href="http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qttestlib/qtest-overview.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">QtTestLib</a> might be the better choice.

blocks|key|1547090|text|我推荐doctest+(由我创建)--它是所有流行测试框架中编译时间最少的。它也是当前使用最多的框架Catch的直接竞争对手-检查FAQ中的差异|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1547091|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/onqtam/doctest|1|https://github.com/philsquared/Catch|2|https://github.com/onqtam/doctest/blob/master/doc/markdown/faq.md#how-is-doctest-different-from-catch^0|3|7|0|1E|5|1|1T|3|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

I would recommend <a href="https://github.com/onqtam/doctest">doctest</a> (created by me) - it's the lightest on compile times from all the popular testing frameworks. It is also a direct competitor to <a href="https://github.com/philsquared/Catch">Catch</a> which is currently the most used framework - checkout the differences in the <a href="https://github.com/onqtam/doctest/blob/master/doc/markdown/faq.md#how-is-doctest-different-from-catch">FAQ</a>

blocks|key|1331431|text|这似乎也是一个相同的问题：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1331432|Unit+testing+in+C%2B%2B，它实际上是c%2B%2B，尽管标题是URL。|offset|length|1331433|从那里，他们链接到另外两个问题，这应该会有所帮助：|1331434|Unit+testing+for+C%2B%2B+code+-+Tools+and+methodology+C%2B%2B+unit+testing+framework|1331435|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/387272/unit-testing-in-c|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/91384/unit-testing-for-c-code-tools-and-methodology|2|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/87794/c-unit-testing-framework^0|0|0|J|0|0|0|0|1D|1|1E|Q|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$D|12|E|13|1|14]|$D|15|E|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|U]]]]

This seems too be the same question as:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/387272/unit-testing-in-c">Unit testing in C++</a> which is actually c++ despite the URL title.

From there, they link to two more SO questions which should help:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/91384/unit-testing-for-c-code-tools-and-methodology">Unit testing for C++ code - Tools and methodology</a>
<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/87794/c-unit-testing-framework">C++ unit testing framework</a>

blocks|key|1546835|text|测试框架的"xUnit“系列通常是相当可靠的(jUnit、NUnit等)。我自己没有用过它，但是有一个用于C%2B%2B的jUnit端口：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1546836|http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit|offset|length|1546837|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|13|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

The "xUnit" family of testing frameworks is usually pretty solid (jUnit, NUnit, etc.). I haven't used it myself, but there is a port of jUnit for C++:

<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit</a>

blocks|key|1547048|text|维基百科上有一个table+comparing+all+(?)+the+C%2B%2B+unit+test+frameworks。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1547049|还有一个旧的comparison+of+C%2B%2B+unit+test+frameworks可用。我不认为它没有更新，所以我提到它作为补充，因为它比表格更具争议性。它涵盖了，CppUnit，CppUnitLite，Boost.Test，NanoCppUnit，Unit%2B%2B，CxxTest，特别是不包括Google+C%2B%2B+framework。|1547050|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B|1|http://gamesfromwithin.com/?p=29|2|http://code.google.com/p/googletest^0|8|1G|0|0|6|12|1|45|K|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]|$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]]]

There is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B" rel="nofollow noreferrer">table comparing all (?) the C++ unit test frameworks</a> available from wikipedia.

There also is an old <a href="http://gamesfromwithin.com/?p=29" rel="nofollow noreferrer">comparison of C++ unit test frameworks</a> available. I do not think it has not been updated so I mention it as a complement as it's more argumented than the table. It covers, CppUnit, CppUnitLite, Boost.Test, NanoCppUnit, Unit++, CxxTest, especially it does not cover <a href="http://code.google.com/p/googletest" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Google C++ framework</a>.

blocks|key|1546694|text|Boost通常是一个很好的选择，并且它包含一个测试框架Boost+Test+Library。我在一些小的测试用例中使用过它，它做了我所期望的事情，但是我还没有像在TTD中那样广泛地使用它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1546695|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/|1|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html^0|0|5|0|R|I|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.boost.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost</a> is usually a good choice, and it contains a testing framework, the <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost Test Library</a>. I have used it for small test cases and it did what I expected, but I haven't used it extensively like in TTD.

blocks|key|1547164|text|如果你想在不知道如何构建一个库的情况下快速上手，有一个头文件include+solution，它支持fixtures+(设置和拆卸)，通常的CHECK_TRUE测试()+{}，等等。它还具有内存泄漏检测和性能测试功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1547165|https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework|offset|length|1547166|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|19|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

If you want to get off the ground quickly without figuring out how to build a library, there is a single header file include solution, which supports fixtures (setup and teardown), the usual TEST() {} with CHECK_TRUE, etc.
It also has memory leak detection and performance testing capabilities.

<a href="https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework</a>

I've been reading a lot about Unit tests and Test Driven developemnt.

Recently, I also read java unit test code.

I however, prefer to develop in Qt. So I googled up "unit testing in c++" and found a host of information about various unit testing frameworks available for C++.

However, I could not find a reliable comparison of the the various frameworks.

So I look to the SO community to guide me through the selection of what may the "best" unit testing framework for c++.

Also, if anybody had specific comments regarding TDD in Qt (especially using Qt-Creator), then they are more than welcome.

Unit testing in C++

单元测试

性能测试

我读了很多关于单元测试和测试驱动开发的内容。最近，我也阅读了java单元测试代码。然而，我更喜欢在Qt中开发。因此，我在谷歌上搜索了“C++中的单元测试”，找到了大量关于C++可用的各种单元测试框架的信息。然而，我找不到各种框架的可靠比较。因此，我希望So社区能够指导我为c++选择“最好的”单元测试框架。此外，如果任何人对Qt中的TDD有具体的意见(特别是使用Qt-Creator)，那么他们非常受

问C++中的单元测试
EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C++中的单元测试EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C++中的单元测试
EN