blocks|key|1681614|text|你可以右击标题栏，选择属性，然后在“布局”选项卡中改变屏幕缓冲区大小(线宽和回滚)和窗口大小(视区大小)。如果cmd是通过快捷方式启动的，则可以保存这些设置以供将来的会话使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1681615|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

It isn't. You can right click the title bar, select properties, and in the "Layout" tab alter the screen buffer size (line width and scrollback) and the window size (viewport size). If you started cmd from a shortcut, you can save these settings for future sessions.

blocks|key|1681890|text|如果你有鼠标恐惧症，你也可以在cmd窗口中输入以下内容：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1681891|mode+<cols>,<lines>
mode+80,25
mode+120,50
etc.|code-block|syntax|javascript|1681892|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|G|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|H|$]]

If you are mouse-phobic you can also just type this inside the cmd window:

<pre><code>mode &lt;cols&gt;,&lt;lines&gt;
mode 80,25
mode 120,50
etc.
</code></pre>

blocks|key|1466351|text|我不知道它背后的历史，但这篇来自PuTTy作者的愿望清单是一个有趣的帖子，解释了任何类型的cmd.exe替代所涉及的技术障碍，而且不是很差劲：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466352|http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/win-command-prompt.html|offset|length|1466353|你没有提到你正在寻找一个替代品，但如果是这样的话，你也可以看看一些cmd.exe的替代品，比如Console+2或JP软件的Take+Command等。我也有一些使用PuTTy-Cyg的很好的经验，它允许你使用PuTTy作为cygwin外壳。|1466354|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/^0|0|0|2A|0|0|1B|9|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$D|S|E|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$D|W|E|X|1|Y]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|C]]|O|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|P]]]]

I don't know the history behind it, but this wishlist item from the author of PuTTy is an interesting post that explains the technical hurdles involved with any type of cmd.exe replacement that isn't lame: 

<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/win-command-prompt.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/win-command-prompt.html</a>

You don't mention that you're looking for a replacement, but if so you might also check out some of the cmd.exe replacements like <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/" rel="noreferrer">Console 2</a> or JP Software's Take Command etc. I've also had some good experiences with PuTTy-Cyg which lets you use PuTTy as a cygwin shell.

blocks|key|1466448|text|正如其他人指出的那样，它并不限于80个字符宽，但我猜测为什么它默认为80个字符，这是从DOS时代遗留下来的，当时CRT显示器是80个字符宽。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466449|See+also|offset|length|1466450|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_mode^0|0|0|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

As others have pointed out, it's not limited to 80 characters wide, but my guess as to why it defaults to 80 characters would be that it's left over from the DOS days where CRT displays were 80 characters wide.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_mode" rel="nofollow noreferrer">See also</a>

blocks|key|1681917|text|您还可以使用不同的终端应用程序，如Console2，它允许您随心所欲地调整窗口大小(其中包括透明度和使用任意字体的能力)。这是一个很棒的应用程序，我已经切换到它，现在我只在绝对必要的时候才使用cmd.exe。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1681918|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/^0|2O|7|H|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]]|D|@$9|Q|A|R|1|S]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]]]

You could also use a different terminal application, such as <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Console2</a>, which allows you to resize the window all you want (among other things, such as transparency, and the ability to use any font you'd like). It's a great application, I've switched to it and now I only use <code>cmd.exe</code> when I absolutely have to.

blocks|key|1466297|text|因为它可以上下滚动，所以我在系统上做的第一件事就是定义我的宽度为180并保存它。这通常就足够了，所以堆栈跟踪在很大程度上不需要包装，但也不会太多，以至于你会浪费大量的空间。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466298|当你这样做的时候，将垂直大小(回滚缓冲区)设置为全9，你会很高兴有一天你这样做了。|1466299|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Since it will scroll left to right as well as up and down, the very first thing I do on a system is define my width as 180 and save it. That's generally enough so that stack traces don't have to wrap for the most part, but not so much that you are waisting a ton of space.

While you're at it, set the vertical size (scrollback buffer) to all 9's. You'll be glad you did some day.

blocks|key|1466400|text|因为微软在很多事情上重视“向后兼容”，在这种情况下，我怀疑这是一种错误的信念，如果人们没有标准的80宽窗口，它会以某种方式让人们感到不安。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466401|当然，也可能是它被编程为固定的80个字符宽度，而这几乎是通用的，并且额外的属性设置有点麻烦。|1466402|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Because MS value "backwards compatibility" over a lot of things and in this case I suspect it's a misplaced belief that it will somehow unnerve people if they don't have their standard 80 wide window.

Of course it could be that it was programmed for a fixed 80 chars width when that was pretty much universal, and the additional property settings were a bit of a hack.

blocks|key|1466481|text|它是有限的。看看这个。(我指的是窗口大小，而不是缓冲区)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466482|您会发现您可以设置的最大宽度是有限的，但会根据您的屏幕分辨率而有所不同。如果您的分辨率设置为1024x768，您将发现在命令提示符宽度上只能达到128。128/1024=.125|1466483|你会发现这个比率在所有方面都是一致的。我有一个运行速度为2000x768的RDP会话(在我的三个监视器中的两个上)，并且获得的最大宽度为250。|1466484|现在，这实际上比你的actaul显示器尺寸大了一点，但我有三个显示器，都运行在单独的桌面上。(所以在本质上，31024x768分辨率)，如果我想做一些简单的事情，比如在两个或更多的监视器上扩展命令提示符，我做不到。(当我做很长路径的事情时(diruse.exe/等)……|1466485|-c|1466486|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

It IS limited. Check it out. (I mean window size NOT buffer)

You will find that the maximum width you can set is limited but varies according to your screen resolution. If your resolution is set to 1024 x 768 you will find that you can only get to 128 on the command prompt width. 128/1024=.125

you will find that ratio to be consistent across the board. I have an RDP session running at 2000x768 (across two of my three monitors) and get a max width of 250.

Now, that actaully turns out to be a little bigger than your actaul monitor size but I have three monitors all running individual desktops. (so in essence, 3 1024x768 resolutions) and if I want to do something SO SIMPLE as stretch a command prompt across 2 or more monitors, I CAN'T. (I want to when doing things with very long paths (diruse.exe/etc.)...

-c

blocks|key|1466648|text|这里还没关门呢。因此，应该注意的是，Windows终端现在正在改变这一切：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1466649|https://github.com/microsoft/terminal+https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/9/21059316/microsoft-windows-terminal-crt-effects-retro-search-tabs-features+https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/windows-command-line-backgrounder/+https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/terminal-v1-roadmap.md+https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-terminal-preview/9n0dx20hk701?activetab=pivot:overviewtab|offset|length|1466650|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/microsoft/terminal|1|https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/9/21059316/microsoft-windows-terminal-crt-effects-retro-search-tabs-features|2|https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/windows-command-line-backgrounder/|3|https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/terminal-v1-roadmap.md|4|https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-terminal-preview/9n0dx20hk701?activetab=pivot:overviewtab^0|0|0|11|0|12|30|1|43|25|2|69|24|3|8E|2R|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]|$D|10|E|11|1|12]|$D|13|E|14|1|15]|$D|16|E|17|1|18]|$D|19|E|1A|1|1B]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|Q]]|R|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|S]]|T|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|U]]]]

This isn't closed. So it should be noted that Windows Terminal is now is changing all of this: 

<a href="https://github.com/microsoft/terminal" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/microsoft/terminal</a>
<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/9/21059316/microsoft-windows-terminal-crt-effects-retro-search-tabs-features" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/9/21059316/microsoft-windows-terminal-crt-effects-retro-search-tabs-features</a>
<a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/windows-command-line-backgrounder/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/windows-command-line-backgrounder/</a>
<a href="https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/terminal-v1-roadmap.md" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/blob/master/doc/terminal-v1-roadmap.md</a>
<a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-terminal-preview/9n0dx20hk701?activetab=pivot:overviewtab" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/windows-terminal-preview/9n0dx20hk701?activetab=pivot:overviewtab</a>

blocks|key|1681989|text|因为改进Unix/GNU类开发所需的任何东西的可用性和功能性都会破坏Windows作为微软合作伙伴的商业平台的地位。阻止这种情况意味着其他大公司为开发人员提供的产品，如改进的终端，以及其他通用第三方产品，如文字处理器、视频播放器等，都不会与现有的Unix/GNU软件竞争。没有这一点，Windows就不会是一个有利可图的平台，微软也将失去其在桌面领域的垄断地位。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1681990|这就是为什么终端很烂，没有POSIX+API，MSVC不支持C99等等。需要澄清的是，通用的Unix/GNU技术和开发是故意不支持的，这样大型商业软件公司就不必与它们竞争。|1681991|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Because improving the usability and functionality of anything that Unix/GNU-like development requires will undermine Windows as a commercial platform for Microsoft's partners. Preventing this means other large companies' products for developers, such as improved terminals, and other general third party products, like word processors, video players etc. aren't competing with existing Unix/GNU software. Without this, Windows wouldn't be a profitable platform, and Microsoft would lose its desktop monopoly.

This is why the terminal sucks, there's no POSIX API, no C99 support in MSVC and the list goes on. To clarify, common Unix/GNU technologies and development are intentionally unsupported so that large commercial software houses don't have to compete with them.

I love stretching my terminal on unix. What is the history or reason behind windows lame command line?

Why is the Windows cmd.exe limited to 80 characters wide?

我喜欢在unix上扩展我的终端。windows lame命令行背后的历史或原因是什么？

问为什么微软的cmd.exe被限制在80个字符以内？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问为什么微软的cmd.exe被限制在80个字符以内？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问为什么微软的cmd.exe被限制在80个字符以内？
EN