blocks|key|1545167|text|Telerik在asp.net端相当多产且易于使用。尽管你会发现你自己破解了它们的一些功能，然后每次更新破解你的破解时，代码都会发生变化。无论如何，它们仍然比重新发明轮子更容易。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545168|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Telerik is fairly prolific and easy to use on the asp.net side. Although you will find yourself hacking some functionality in and out of them and then having a code change everytime an update breaks your hacks.. regardless they are still easier than re-inventing the wheel.

blocks|key|1544899|text|我更喜欢DevExpress。不知何故，它的组件对我来说似乎比Infragistic的更直观。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1544900|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.devexpress.com/^0|4|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I prefer <a href="http://www.devexpress.com/" rel="noreferrer">DevExpress</a>.
Its components somehow seem more intuitive to me than Infragistic's.

blocks|key|1544966|text|DevExpress的东西，一直都是。获得一个更大的DevEx订阅的一个很大的副作用是你得到了CodeRush和重构！也加入了:D|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1544967|特别是DevEx网格，它是首屈一指的。|1544968|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.devexpress.com/^0|0|A|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.devexpress.com/" rel="noreferrer">DevExpress</a> stuff, all the way. A great side-effect of grabbing one of the bigger DevEx subscriptions is that you get CodeRush and Refactor! thrown in, too :D

The DevEx grid, in particular, is second-to-none.

blocks|key|1544852|text|我可以推荐ASP.NET版的Telerik，它们非常好用，但只会用在内部网应用上，因为它们大多功能强大，但是很笨重。对于WinForms，DevComponents有一套出色的组件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1544853|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.telerik.com/|1|http://www.devcomponents.com/^0|E|7|0|1X|D|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

I could recommend <a href="http://www.telerik.com/" rel="noreferrer">Telerik</a> for ASP.NET. They are very nice but would only use them for an Intranet application as they are mostly powerful but heavy. 
For WinForms <a href="http://www.devcomponents.com/" rel="noreferrer">DevComponents</a> have a brilliant set of components.

blocks|key|1545015|text|我使用过Telerik、Syncfusion和Infragistics的第三方控件，我会按照这个顺序给它们打分。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1545016|Telerik控件使用起来比Infragistics好一个数量级。|1545017|我的0.02美元。|1545018|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.telerik.com/|1|http://www.syncfusion.com/|2|http://www.infragistics.com/^0|4|7|0|C|A|1|N|C|2|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]|$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]|$A|10|B|11|1|12]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]|R|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|S]]]]

I have used <a href="http://www.telerik.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Telerik</a>, <a href="http://www.syncfusion.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Syncfusion</a> and <a href="http://www.infragistics.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Infragistics</a> third party controls and I would rate them in that order.

Telerik controls are an order of magnitude more pleasant to work with than Infragistics.

My $0.02.

blocks|key|1759968|text|Peter+Blum的数据输入套件|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1759969|http://www.peterblum.com/DES/Home.aspx|offset|length|1759970|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|12|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

Peter Blum's Data Entry Suite

<a href="http://www.peterblum.com/DES/Home.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.peterblum.com/DES/Home.aspx</a>

blocks|key|1545144|text|我只使用了基础架构，但并不真正推荐它。为了复杂起见，它通常看起来很复杂，更不用说我在其中看到了多个bug。此外，在web领域，它并不是完全跨浏览器兼容的。很多应用程序样式列表的东西都不能很好地转换到火狐上，而且WebCombo在新的Google+Chrome/Chromium浏览器上崩溃得很厉害。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545145|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've only used infragistic, but wouldn't really recommend it. It often seems complicated for the sake of complication, not to mention the fact that I've seen multiple bugs in it. Also, in web-land, it isn't very cross browser compliant. A lot of App Stylist things don't translate over to Firefox well, and the WebCombo blows up horribly in the new Google Chrome/Chromium browser.

blocks|key|1545202|text|适用于Windows+Forms和ASP.net的DevExpress。有一个学习曲线，但一旦你理解了事物的工作方式，就没有什么是你不能做的。几年前我们使用Scheduler时，它是市场上最好的。网格和图表让客户大吃一惊。他们的支持是非常响应性的，这是一个通常的观点。当你试图做一些控件不能做的事情时，你会经常看到在未来的版本中添加该功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545203|底线:很棒的东西！|1545204|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

DevExpress for both Windows Forms and ASP.net. There is a learning curve, but once you understand the way things work, there is very little that you can't do. The Scheduler was the best on the market when we used it several years ago. The grid and charting has blown clients away. Their support is very responsive a usually on point. When you are trying to do sonething that the controls are not capable of doing, you will often see that feature added in a future release.

Bottom line: Great stuff!

blocks|key|1544925|text|Infragistics|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1544926|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

blocks|key|1759955|text|我支持DevExpress+-尽管它们并不总是最终的解决方案。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1759956|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I second DevExpress - though they're not always the end-all solution.

blocks|key|1760001|text|仅使用Infragistics和Janus控件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1760002|Infragistics还可以，但不是很好。|1760003|我希望我再也不用使用Janus了，这是最糟糕也不直观的API之一。我只需点击几下，就可以使提供的示例崩溃...|1760004|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Only used Infragistics' and Janus controls.

Infragistics is ok but not good.

I wish I wont ever have to use Janus again, one of the worst and not intuitive APIs. And I can crash the provided sample with a few clicks...

blocks|key|1760115|text|除了其他答案，我不想忘记Intersoft的控件:+Webgrid、WebCombo、WebDesktop等等。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1760116|我使用它们(在其他供应商的控件旁边)很多年了。尤其是webgrid是非常专业的。|1760117|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.intersoftpt.com/^0|C|9|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

In addition to the other answers, I'd like not to forget <a href="http://www.intersoftpt.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Intersoft</a>'s controls: Webgrid, WebCombo, WebDesktop and many more.

I use them (beside other vendor's controls) for many years. Especially the webgrid is very professional.

blocks|key|1545320|text|DevExpress也得到了我的支持，我和我的开发团队在过去的三年里一直在使用企业包，它满足了我们的期望。我们喜欢DevExpress的一点是，他们有出色的支持，并不断更新他们的套件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545321|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

DevExpress gets my vote as well my and my development team have been using the Enterprise package for the past 3 years and it's met our expectations. One thing we love about DevExpress is that they have EXCELLENT support and constantly updating their suite.

blocks|key|1545336|text|Telerik，DevExpress，Peter+Blum验证控件都很好。虽然我们不再使用服务器控件来做那些只能在客户端完成的事情，但我们开始尽可能多地使用jQuery。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545337|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Telerik, DevExpress, Peter Blum Validation Controls are all good. Although we are moving away from using Server controls for things that can be done solely on the client side and starting to use jQuery as much as possible.

blocks|key|1760298|text|老实说，Syncfusion是可怕的控件，因为客户端的原因，他们已经使用了两年。糟糕的控制，糟糕的架构，没有文档。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1760299|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

To be honest Syncfusion are horrible controls, been using them for 2 years, because of the client. Horrible controls, horrible architecture and no documentation.

blocks|key|1760363|text|我使用的是Xceed的DataGrid和很多来自DevComponents的不同组件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1760364|此外，Xceed还提供了一组出色的文档和代码示例。|1760365|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I'm using Xceed's DataGrid and quite a few different components from DevComponents.

Also, Xceed has a phenomenal set of Documentation and Code Samples.

blocks|key|1544789|text|Telerik+-+RAD编辑器、树和图形-不错的应用程序|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1544790|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Telerik - RAD Editor, Tree and Graphs - nice apps

blocks|key|1545064|text|我们选择Syncfusion主要是因为它几乎完全处理了RightToLeft+-他们仍然有一些bug，但他们非常关注问题，bug和功能请求。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1545065|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.syncfusion.com/^0|4|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

We chose <a href="http://www.syncfusion.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Syncfusion</a> mainly because of it's almost complete handling of RightToLeft - they still have some bugs here and there, but they are very attentive to questions, bugs and feature requests.

blocks|key|1760140|text|我现在工作的客户端也在使用SyncFusion+Essential+Suite。我们主要使用Excel和Word+IO库，我对此非常满意。它们还提供了许多ASP.NET+Ajax控件，其中有一个非常广泛的DataGrid。这提供了相当多的功能，但不幸的是没有那么好的性能。总而言之，价格比Telerik组件便宜一点，这就是客户最终决定使用它的原因。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1760141|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

The client I'm working now is also using the SyncFusion Essential Suite. We've mostly used the Excel and Word IO libraries, of which I'm prettuy satisfied. They also provide a number of ASP.NET Ajax controls, among which a very extensive DataGrid. This offers quite a lot of features but unfortunately doesn's perform that well. All in all, the pricing is a little bit cheaper than the Telerik components, that's why the client decided for it in the end.

blocks|key|1545386|text|多年来，我们在我们的一个项目中广泛使用了ComponentArt。它们在某种程度上是有用的，因为每隔一段时间，就会有一个要求，这是不可能使用现有的API实现的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545387|我在另一个项目中也使用了Infragistics，现在正在开发一个使用Telerik的项目，我可以告诉你一件事:多花点钱，买一个包含完整源代码的控制套件。迟早，你会遇到一个限制，而拥有源代码将是一个很大的帮助。|1545388|当然，更改源代码的缺点是，当新版本到来时，它会变得过时，但这仍然比从控制套件供应商那里请求一个功能，然后希望它将成为下一个版本的一部分要好。|1545389|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

We have used ComponentArt extensively in one of our projects for years now. They are useful up to a point, as every now and then, there will be a requirement, that is just not possible to implement using the existing API. 

Having used Infragistics as well in another project and now working on one that uses Telerik, I can tell you one thing: Spend some extra money and buy a control suite with the full source code. Sooner or later, you will come across a limitation, and having the source code with you will be a great help. 

Of course, changing the source code has the downside of it becoming obsolete when a new version arrives, but it is still better then requesting a feature from the control suite vendor and then hoping that it will be part of the next release.

blocks|key|1545485|text|根据我所看到的，中间网格似乎相当慢。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1545486|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

from what I seen the intersoft grids seem to be quite slow

I am re-evaluating my 3rd party controls. I currently use the Infragistics tools suite for ASP.Net and WinForms. What controls do you use and would you recommend them?

What 3rd Party Controls are .Net Developers using

我正在重新评估我的第三方控制。我目前使用的是用于ASP.Net和WinForms的工具套件。你使用什么控件，你会推荐它们吗？

问.Net开发人员使用哪些第三方控件
EN

回答 21

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.Net开发人员使用哪些第三方控件EN

回答 21

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.Net开发人员使用哪些第三方控件
EN