blocks|key|1134690|text|至于与Git的比较，谷歌最近根据他们的评估发布了一个关于Git和Mercurial的有趣比较：http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1134691|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis^0|1B|1E|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

As far as comparing to Git, Google recently published an interesting comparison of Git and Mercurial based on their evaluation: <a href="http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis</a>

blocks|key|1350075|text|在谷歌的比较中没有提到的一件事是Git似乎要快得多。Mercurial似乎足够快了(至少对于小项目)，但无论项目规模如何，Git都非常快。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1350076|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

One thing not mentioned in the Google comparison was that Git appears to be much faster. Mercurial seems fast enough (with small projects at least) but Git is simply lightning-fast no matter what size the project.

blocks|key|1350146|text|关于比较Mercurial和Git+-请看这个问题：Git+and+Mercurial+-+Compare+and+Contrast+(和my+long+answer在那里)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1350147|关于Mercurial和svn的比较-请看这个问题：For+home+projects,+can+Mercurial+or+Git+(or+other+DVCS)+provide+more+advantages+over+Subversion?+(理论上这个问题的范围是有限的；我在我的答案中写了关于Git+vs+Subversion的内容)。|1350148|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast/1599930#1599930|2|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1218471/for-home-projects-can-mercurial-or-git-or-other-dvcs-provide-more-advantages-o|3|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1218471/for-home-projects-can-mercurial-or-git-or-other-dvcs-provide-more-advantages-o/1218657#1218657^0|Q|14|0|1X|E|1|0|Q|2O|2|46|H|3|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]|$A|X|B|Y|1|Z]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$A|11|B|12|1|13]|$A|14|B|15|1|16]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]|R|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|S]]]]

About comparing Mercurial with Git - see this SO question: <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast">Git and Mercurial - Compare and Contrast</a> (and <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast/1599930#1599930">my long answer</a> there).

About comparing Mercurial with svn - see this SO question: <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1218471/for-home-projects-can-mercurial-or-git-or-other-dvcs-provide-more-advantages-o">For home projects, can Mercurial or Git (or other DVCS) provide more advantages over Subversion?</a> (theoretically this question is limited in range, though; I wrote about <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1218471/for-home-projects-can-mercurial-or-git-or-other-dvcs-provide-more-advantages-o/1218657#1218657">Git vs Subversion</a> in my answer).

blocks|key|1134892|text|SVN有很多第三方工具的支持，包括集成开发环境和错误跟踪系统等，包括相当不错的TortoiseSVN。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1134893|大多数开发人员过去都使用过SVN，因此使用SVN可以更快地让新开发人员熟悉您的团队。|1134894|这类事情对你有多重要，只有你自己能决定。|1134895|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/^0|13|B|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]]]

SVN has lots of support by 3rd party tools including IDE and bug tracking systems etc including the rather nice <a href="http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TortoiseSVN</a>.

Most developers have used SVN in the past, so getting new developers up to speed on your team is quicker with SVN.

How important this sort of thing is to you, only you can decide.

blocks|key|1350354|text|与SVN相比，Mercurial令人惊叹。这给了我一种“为什么还会有人使用SVN”的感觉。SVN相当不错，但Mercurial确实工作得更好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1350355|对于个人项目，我会毫无疑问地切换到DVCS。它可以做SVN做的所有事情，但是做得更好，而且速度更快。“学习曲线”就是理解一些术语。|1350356|实际上，SVN和DVCS之间的不同之处在于，每个人的系统上都有一个完整的工作存储库。如果您决定使用“主服务器”，它与您所拥有的完全相同，只是它被设置为通过网络连续提供服务。要同步这些，您所要做的就是在这些存储库之间发送/接收(推/拉)更改。|1350357|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Compared to SVN, for which I recently worked with again after quite awhile, Mercurial is amazing. It gave me a feeling of "Why would anyone use SVN anymore". SVN is pretty good, but Mercurial really does just work better. 

For personal projects I would switch without a doubt to a DVCS. It does everything SVN does but better, and much faster. The "learning curve" is just understanding some terminology. 

In reality the difference between SVN and a DVCS is that everyone has a full working repository on their system. If you decide to have a "master server", it is exactly the same as what you have, except it is setup to continually serve over a network. To sync these all you do is send/receive(push/pull) the changes between these repositories.

blocks|key|1135114|text|可能只有我，但我已经使用Mercurial六个月了，在几年的单独使用SVN之后，出于某种原因，它就是不适合我的心理模型。我很清楚我在SVN中做了什么，如果出现问题，我几乎总是知道如何修复它。从概念上讲，我对Mercurial没有问题-例如，我喜欢我有一个存储库的本地副本-但在实践中，我总是丢失一些东西。我认为这可能是因为在SVN中合并是一件很大的事情，而在Hg中这是正常的方式。我想要更多的控制我的合并。在SVN中，哪个变更集在哪个变更集之前总是很清楚的，但Mercurial似乎缺乏这一点。即使是视觉上相当不错的TortoiseHg，似乎也没有提供足够的机会来确切地看到正在合并的内容。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1135115|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

It's probably just me, but I have been using Mercurial for six months, after several years of using SVN exclusively, and for some reason it just doesn't fit my mental model as well. I know exactly what I'm doing in SVN, and if something goes wrong, I pretty much always know how to fix it. Conceptually I have no problem with Mercurial - love that I have a local copy of the repository, for example - but in practise I am always losing things. I think it might be because a merge in SVN is quite a big deal, whereas in Hg it's the normal way of things. I want more control over my merges. In SVN it's always clear which changeset precedes which, but Mercurial seems to lack this. Even TortoiseHg, which is quite nice visually, doesn't seem to offer enough opportunities to see exactly what's being merged.

With Phil Haack and others recently tweeting about <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/codeplex/archive/2010/01/22/codeplex-now-supporting-native-mercurial.aspx" rel="noreferrer">CodePlex's move to support Mercurial</a> as a DVCS, I thought it might be worth a look.

As someone who currently uses SVN for personal projects and TFS at The Office, how does Mercurial compare in terms of usability, features and what are some of the better Mercurial hosting services available?

How does Mercurial stack up against GIT and SVN?

集成开发环境

服务器

由于Phil Haack和其他人最近在推特上谈论作为DVCS，我认为它可能值得一看。作为目前在办公室使用SVN进行个人项目和TFS的人，Mercurial在可用性、功能以及可用的一些更好的Mercurial托管服务方面如何比较？

问与GIT和SVN相比，Mercurial的表现如何？
EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问与GIT和SVN相比，Mercurial的表现如何？EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问与GIT和SVN相比，Mercurial的表现如何？
EN