blocks|key|331067|text|TeamCity有一个很棒的功能，允许开发人员在提交之前执行个人构建。非常有用！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|331068|CruiseControl.NET是其中的鼻祖，因此在视觉上有点过时。由于它已经存在了一段时间，谷歌知道如何解决你会遇到的许多问题。|331069|由于这些原因(以及其他原因)，我在工作中使用CruiseControl.NET，在家里和我的开源生活中使用TeamCity+:)|331070|entityMap^0|0|8|0|0|H|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@$9|M|A|N|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@$9|P|A|Q|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|R|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|K|$]]

TeamCity has a wonderful feature of allowing the developer to perform a personal build before committing. Very useful!

CruiseControl.NET is the granddaddy of the bunch and is hence a little dated visually etc. As it has been around for a while, Google knows how to fix many issues you will come up against.

For these reasons (amongst others), I use CruiseControl.NET at work and TeamCity at home and in my open source life :)

blocks|key|3089246|text|CruiseControl.NET+-设置它可能有点痛苦(大多数CI系统也是如此)，但它值得坚持下去。我目前已经将其设置为在构建完成时运行单元测试，并按需生成Wix安装程序。正如Dan所说，它看起来有点过时，但这并不重要，因为它为您提供了大量易于获取和阅读的信息。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3089247|有一件事--确保你所有的开发人员都安装了CC+Tray，正在运行，并指向他们的构建。在您的通知栏中获得“另一个成功的构建”是一种很棒的感觉。|3089248|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

CruiseControl.NET - it can be a bit of a pain to set up (as can most CI systems), but it is worth perservering with. I currently have it set up to run unit tests on completion of builds, and to produce Wix installers on-demand. As Dan said, it looks a bit dated, but that doesn't matter, as it provides you with plenty of information that's easy to get at and easy to read.

One thing - make sure all your developers have CC Tray installed, running and pointing to their builds. It's a great feeling to get "Another successful build" in your notification tray.

blocks|key|3089257|text|在以下方面没有任何帮助：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3089258|3089259|Anything+better+than+CruiseControl+for+.NET+CI?|unordered-list-item|offset|length|3089260|Continuous+Integration+Servers|3089261|Hudson+or+Teamcity+for+continuous+integration?|3089262|What+is+your+experience+with+CI+server+git+support+(Windows)?|3089263|Language-agnostic+automated+build+and+test+server+for+multiple+projects|3089264|Choosing+the+correct+CI+Server+for+my+needs.|3089265|Cruise+versus+TeamCity+versus+CruiseControl.NET|3089266|CruiseControl+[.NET]+vs+TeamCity+for+continuous+integration?|3089267|etc，等，etc|3089268|3089269|：Jonik在一条评论中指出，我错过了What+is+the+difference+between+Hudson+and+CruiseControl+for+Java+projects?和How+and+why+do+I+set+up+a+C#+build+machine?。你会发现非常有洞察力的答案。换句话说，我认为你正在寻找的所有东西都已经在Stack+Overflow上了。|3089270|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1427444/anything-better-than-cruisecontrol-for-net-ci|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/140453/continuous-integration-servers|2|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1404459/hudson-or-teamcity-for-continuous-integration|3|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1321105/what-is-your-experience-with-ci-server-git-support-windows|4|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1200721/language-agnostic-automated-build-and-test-server-for-multiple-projects|5|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1013060/choosing-the-correct-ci-server-for-my-needs|6|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/741679/cruise-versus-teamcity-versus-cruisecontrol-net|7|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/195835/cruisecontrol-net-vs-teamcity-for-continuous-integration|8|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/604385/what-is-the-difference-between-hudson-and-cruisecontrol-for-java-projects/888054#888054|9|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/616149/how-and-why-do-i-set-up-a-c-build-machine^0|0|0|0|1B|0|0|0|U|1|0|0|1A|2|0|0|1P|3|0|0|1Z|4|0|0|18|5|0|0|1B|6|0|0|1O|7|0|0|0|J|22|8|2M|17|9|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|1R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|1S|8|@]|9|@$F|1T|G|1U|1|1V]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1W|8|@]|9|@$F|1X|G|1Y|1|1Z]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|20|8|@]|9|@$F|21|G|22|1|23]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|24|8|@]|9|@$F|25|G|26|1|27]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|E|7|28|8|@]|9|@$F|29|G|2A|1|2B]]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|E|7|2C|8|@]|9|@$F|2D|G|2E|1|2F]]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|E|7|2G|8|@]|9|@$F|2H|G|2I|1|2J]]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|E|7|2K|8|@]|9|@$F|2L|G|2M|1|2N]]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|E|7|2O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|-4|5|6|7|2P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|6|7|2Q|8|@]|9|@$F|2R|G|2S|1|2T]|$F|2U|G|2V|1|2W]]|A|$]]|$1|10|3|-4|5|6|7|2X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|11|$12|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|17]]|18|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|19]]|1A|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1B]]|1C|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1D]]|1E|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1F]]|1G|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1H]]|1I|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1J]]|1K|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1L]]|1M|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1N]]|1O|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|1P]]]]

Nothing helpful in:

<ul>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1427444/anything-better-than-cruisecontrol-for-net-ci">Anything better than CruiseControl for .NET CI?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/140453/continuous-integration-servers">Continuous Integration Servers</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1404459/hudson-or-teamcity-for-continuous-integration">Hudson or Teamcity for continuous integration?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1321105/what-is-your-experience-with-ci-server-git-support-windows">What is your experience with CI server git support (Windows)?</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1200721/language-agnostic-automated-build-and-test-server-for-multiple-projects">Language-agnostic automated build and test server for multiple projects</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1013060/choosing-the-correct-ci-server-for-my-needs">Choosing the correct CI Server for my needs.</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/741679/cruise-versus-teamcity-versus-cruisecontrol-net">Cruise versus TeamCity versus CruiseControl.NET</a></li>
<li><a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/195835/cruisecontrol-net-vs-teamcity-for-continuous-integration">CruiseControl [.NET] vs TeamCity for continuous integration?</a></li>
<li>etc, etc, etc</li>
</ul>

EDIT: A pointed out by Jonik in a comment, I missed <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/604385/what-is-the-difference-between-hudson-and-cruisecontrol-for-java-projects/888054#888054">What is the difference between Hudson and CruiseControl for Java projects?</a> and <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/616149/how-and-why-do-i-set-up-a-c-build-machine">How and why do I set up a C# build machine?</a>. You'll find very insightful answers. In other words, I think that everything you're looking for is already on Stack Overflow.

blocks|key|329934|text|我是CI领域的新手，我一直专注于CruiseControl.NET，使用NAnt和Ivy来构建我的.NET项目。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|329935|我发现CruiseControl.NET非常适用于许多其他工具，例如NCover/NUnit/等。它们都插入其中，并将结果集成到一个组合的构建过程中。|329936|出于我自己的兴趣，我将在不久的将来研究TeamCity，但我认为CruiseControl做得很好，但只能和您的构建脚本一样好！如果这是裤子，那么你的构建只能被期望那么好。|329937|但总而言之，CruiseControl.NET是一个很好的解决方案，但我还没有发现竞争对手相比有多好。|329938|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

I'm fairly new to the CI-scene and I've been concentrating my efforts on CruiseControl.NET, using NAnt and Ivy to build my .NET projects.

I've found that CruiseControl.NET is very adaptable to lots of other tools, such as NCover/NUnit/etc. They all plug into this and integrate the results for a combined build process.

I'll be looking into TeamCity in the near future for my own interest, but I think that CruiseControl does a good job, but only as good as your build-scripts! If these are pants, then your builds can only be expected to be that good.

But in summary, CruiseControl.NET is a good solution, but I'm yet to find out how good the competition is in comparison.

blocks|key|3089306|text|我们在工作中使用ccnet，这可以满足我们的大多数需求(我们有大约50个自动化构建)，但它需要一个人来进行全职的调整和修复。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3089307|如果你是从头开始的，请看一下竹子。我们已经研究过了，它看起来真的很有前途，但它并不完全符合我们的需求，我们在ccnet上投入了太多的时间来切换到现在的竹子。|3089308|致以敬意，|3089309|塞巴斯蒂安|3089310|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

We're using ccnet at work, which is fine for most of our needs (we have about 50 automated builds), but it needs one person for full time tweaking and fixing.

If you're starting from scratch, please take a look at Bamboo. We have looked into it and it looks really promising, but it doesn't completely match our needs and we have invested way too much time in ccnet to switch to Bamboo now.

Regards,

Sebastiaan

blocks|key|3302304|text|我们在工作中使用Hudson。主要原因是，它非常容易设置。您可以直接执行war+(它是一个可执行的jar)，也可以将其部署到任何servlet容器中。现在就可以开始了。此外，Hudson支持许多工具，并可通过其插件系统进行扩展。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3302305|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

We use Hudson at work. The main reason is, that it is very easy to setup. You can directly execute the war (it's a executable jar) or deploy it at any servlet-container. And you're ready to start. Also Hudson supports many tools and is extensible through it's plugin-system.

blocks|key|3302384|text|我一直都是CruiseControl.NET的用户。我的团队在工作中使用它，我在家里使用它进行个人项目。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3302385|特别是，CruiseControl.NET允许我运行整个CI过程:构建、版本更新、单元和集成测试、源或发布候选版本的存档、代码覆盖率，甚至是在工作中部署到我们的测试系统。它是高度可定制的，可以与MSBuild和NAnt很好地协同工作，甚至还具有一个可扩展的插件体系结构。|3302386|它几乎做了我需要的一切。|3302387|最大的缺点是:配置有时很痛苦，而且可能需要时间。但是一旦它完成了，它就完成了，正如另一个帖子所说，我喜欢看到“成功构建”的信号，因为我知道不仅构建本身工作，而且我的单元和集成测试都运行成功。|3302388|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

I'm a CruiseControl.NET user all the way. My teams uses it at work and I use it at home for personal projects.

In particular, CruiseControl.NET allows me to run through the whole CI process: builds, version update, unit and integration tests, archival of source or release candidate, code coverage, even deployment to our test system at work. It's highly customizable, works well with MSBuild and NAnt, and even had an extensible plug-in architecture.

It pretty much does everything I need.

The biggest disadvantage: configuration is sometimes a pain, and can take time. But once it's done, it's done, and as another poster said, I love seeing the "successful build" signal because I know that not only did the build itself work, but that also that my unit and integration tests all ran successfully.

blocks|key|333433|text|Team+Foundation+Build是一个选项，因为它可以与Team+Foundation+Server很好地交互。只要你许可了TFS，它就是免费的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|333434|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms364045%2528VS.80%2529.aspx^0|0|L|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms364045%28VS.80%29.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Team Foundation Build</a> is an option as well as it interacts very well with Team Foundation Server. It's free as long as long you've licensed TFS.

blocks|key|330017|text|我继承了一台luntbuild服务器。对于.NET项目来说，这不是一个好的选择。如果您发现您经常退回到使用构建服务器来运行通用命令行任务，那么一定是出了问题。一个好的构建服务器对单元测试、输出和msbuild任务有很好的理解，而不是在源代码控制系统更改时运行不透明的命令。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|330018|我喜欢迁移到Team+City。|330019|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I inherited a luntbuild server. Not a good option for a .NET project. If you find that you're constantly falling back to using the build server to run generic command line tasks, then something is wrong. A good build server had a good understanding of unit tests output and msbuild tasks as more than opaque commands to be run when the source control system changes. 

I'm enjoying migrating to Team City.

blocks|key|3302529|text|我们从CruiseControl.NET切换到TeamCity，主要是因为配置简单。TeamCity还具有更多特性，但主要原因是良好的Web比XML配置文件更易于使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3302530|编辑:大多数任务TeamCity都会开箱即用；必要时我们会使用NAnt。|3302531|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

We switched from CruiseControl.NET to TeamCity primarily because of ease of configuration. TeamCity also has more features, but the main reason was that a nice Web UI is simpler to use than XML configuration files.

EDIT: Most tasks TeamCity will do out of the box; when necessary we use NAnt.

blocks|key|3302581|text|我们对Hudson很满意。我没有任何东西可以与之比较，但它很容易配置和运行。现在它只构建Win32+C%2B%2B项目和一个安装程序，但我们正在移植到Linux上，它应该也能与之兼容。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3302582|毫无问题地获取Subversion存储库，并通过邮件发送警报等。到目前为止，我们很喜欢它。同样，我们在比较方面的经验有限。|3302583|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_(software))|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subversion_(software)^0|3|6|0|0|7|A|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

We're happy with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_(software)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Hudson</a>. I don't have anything to compare it to, but it was simple to configure and get running. Right now it only builds Win32 C++ projects and an installer, but we're porting to Linux and it should work with that as well. 

Gets <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subversion_(software)" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Subversion</a> repositories without any problems and mails out alerts, etc. We like it so far. Again, we have limited experience with comparisons.

blocks|key|3089712|text|如果没有到大型CI+Feature+Matrix(Web+Archive)的链接，这样的问题是不完整的，它列出了几乎所有的CI选项。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3089713|但我认为，提前了解您希望包含在CI系统中的范围是很重要的。这是仅仅是构建，还是你打算引入其他元素，如静态分析，跨项目依赖，部署，功能测试等。为了帮助规划，我在Elements+of+Enterprise+CI上创建了这个挂图。请不要让"E-word“让你望而却步；我只是指基本的快速反馈CI构建之外的东西。:)|3089714|它不是特定于工具的，而是列出了您在计划/评估阶段可能会考虑的各种实践。|3089715|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://web.archive.org/web/20130730154141/http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/CI%2BFeature%2BMatrix|1|http://www.urbancode.com/html/resources/elements-enterprise-ci.html^0|7|U|0|0|27|P|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]]]

No question like this is complete without a link to the big <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130730154141/http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/CI+Feature+Matrix" rel="noreferrer">CI Feature Matrix(Web Archive)</a> which lists just about every CI option out there.

But I think it is important to look ahead to the scope of what you want to include in your CI system. Is it going to be just builds or are you going to be bringing in other elements like static analysis, cross-project dependencies, deployments, functional tests, etc. To help with that planning I created this wallchart on the <a href="http://www.urbancode.com/html/resources/elements-enterprise-ci.html" rel="noreferrer">Elements of Enterprise CI</a> (PDF; no registration required). Please don't let the "E-word" put you off; I just mean stuff beyond the basic fast feedback CI build. :)

It isn't tool specific but lists a variety of practices you might consider while you're in the planning/evaluation stages.

blocks|key|333529|text|我使用CruiseControl.NET，TFS2012和TeamCity+7.x已经有几年了，我相信TeamCity是最好的，因为它的易用性，舒适和信息丰富的UI以及其他很酷的功能，比如构建依赖等等。它很管用，我喜欢它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|333530|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I've been working with CruiseControl.NET, TFS 2012 and TeamCity 7.x for several years and i believe TeamCity is the BEST due to it's ease of use, comfortable and informative UI and other cool features like build dependencies and many more. It just works, I love it.

I am searching for a comparison of different
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration" rel="noreferrer">continuous integration</a> (CI) Servers (esp. focusing
on .NET) and couldn't find any.

Therefore I'd like to know what you think about the
different solutions available, what are the pros and cons,
what are the hosting requirements and why CI Server XY is
the Server of your choice.

I am interested in your thoughts on (feel free to comment on
others to):

<ul>
<li><a href="http://hudson-ci.org/" rel="noreferrer">Hudson</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/" rel="noreferrer">CruiseControl</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cruisecontrolnet.org/" rel="noreferrer">CruiseControl.NET</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity" rel="noreferrer">Teamcity</a></li>
<li>CIFactory (uses CruiseControl.NET)</li>
</ul>

Points of Interest are:

<ul>
<li>Configuration (easy, flexible)</li>
<li>Integration with SCM (esp. DSVC like git or hg)</li>
<li>Integration with build sytems (MSBuild, NAnt, Rake)</li>
<li>Integration with Testing Frameworks</li>
<li>Integration with Source Anaylsis (Simian, NDepend, FxCop, NCover etc.)</li>
<li>WebInterface/Dashboards</li>
<li>Infrastructure requirements</li>
</ul>

Comparison of CI Servers?

我正在搜索不同 (CI)服务器的比较(特别是专注于.NET)，但找不到任何。因此，我想知道您对可用的不同解决方案的看法，优缺点是什么，托管要求是什么，为什么CI Server XY是您选择的服务器。我感兴趣的是你对以下内容的看法(请随意评论他人)： CIFactory (使用CruiseControl.NET)感兴趣的...

问CI服务器的比较？
EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问CI服务器的比较？EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问CI服务器的比较？
EN