blocks|key|1739690|text|Jetbrains+TeamCity看起来真的很不错。它是基于java的，所以你的团队应该很容易扩展，并且可以做分布式构建等。有一个免费的版本你可以评估一下。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1739691|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/index.html^0|A|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Jetbrains <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/index.html" rel="noreferrer">TeamCity</a> looked really good when we looked at it. It is java based so should be easy for your teamn to extend, and can do distributed builds etc... There's a freebie version you can evaluate.

blocks|key|1524827|text|Atlassian的Bamboo看起来不错，但我没有使用它的经验。在功能上看起来与Cruise或TeamCity相似。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1524828|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/|1|http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration|2|http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/index.html^0|A|6|0|15|6|1|1C|8|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

Atlassian's <a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Bamboo</a> looks nice but I don't have any experience with it. Looks to be similar in features to <a href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Cruise</a> or <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TeamCity</a>.

blocks|key|1740170|text|如果您使用的是Atlassian+staff软件(例如Jira、Clover等)竹子是你的方式。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1740171|我们用了几个月了，我可以推荐它。它物有所值。|1740172|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

If you are using Atlassian staff software (e.g. Jira, Clover etc.) Bamboo is your way.

We use it for couple months and I can recommend it. It worth its money.

blocks|key|1524890|text|竹子很好用；如果你有现金，我会推荐你。Cruise+Control是物有所值的；我从来没有能够让它可靠地发现源代码的更改是做了和构建的，我也没有能够让它手动构建。界面和配置非常复杂。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1524891|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Bamboo works great; if you have cash I'd recommend that. Cruise Control is worth its price; I've never been able to get it to reliably discover that source changes were made and build, nor have I have been able to get it to build manually. The interface and configuration are horribly complex.

blocks|key|1524586|text|我们使用Cruise+Control。它有我们想要的所有功能，并且很容易设置。与ANT和SVN的集成很好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1524587|缺点:每隔一段时间，我们必须重新启动进程或机器，因为它停止发送夜间构建的消息。我不知道这是怎么回事，但这真的很烦人。|1524588|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/^0|4|E|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

We use <a href="http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Cruise Control</a>. It's got all the features we want and was pretty easy to set up. Integration w/ ANT and SVN is fine.

Con: every once in a while we have to restart the process or the machine as it stops sending out messages for the nightly build. Not sure what that's about but it's just annoying.

blocks|key|1525241|text|关于Continuous+Integration+Feature+Matrix只有一句话:它不是由CruiseControl人员收集的，它是由DamageControl项目收集的，并在DamageControl进入休眠时转移到了CruiseControl维基。这些信息很大程度上是由项目/产品所有者或其粉丝维护的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1525242|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/CI%2BFeature%2BMatrix^0|2|11|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Just a word on the <a href="http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/CI+Feature+Matrix" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Continuous Integration Feature Matrix</a>: it wasn't collected by the CruiseControl people, it was <a href="http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix" rel="nofollow noreferrer">started on CodeHaus</a> by the DamageControl project and moved to the CruiseControl wiki when DamageControl went into hibernation. The information is largely maintained by the project/product owners or by their fans.

blocks|key|1740469|text|我对bamboo很满意。在选择它之前，我研究了一些免费的解决方案。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1740470|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/^0|2|6|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I am happy with <a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/bamboo/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">bamboo</a>. I looked at a number of free solutions before settling on it.

blocks|key|1739749|text|我们已经使用了Cruise+Control并取得了不错的效果。从那以后，我们开始在我们所有的项目中使用Maven作为构建工具。随之而来的是转会到哈德森的CI，这是非常好的。如果您认为将来可能会迁移到Maven，我建议您这样做。我认为Hudson甚至可以用来调用Ant任务，尽管Maven包装器可能是合适的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1739750|http://hudson-ci.org/|offset|length|1739751|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|L|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

We've used Cruise Control with decent results. We have since started using Maven for the build tool in all our projects. With that came the move to Hudson for CI which is very nice. If you think a move to Maven might be in your future, I'd recommend it. I think Hudson can even be used to call Ant tasks though a Maven wrapper might be in order.

<a href="http://hudson-ci.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://hudson-ci.org/</a>

blocks|key|1524773|text|CruiseControl+Cruise是Thoughtworks开源项目的商业产物。看起来很不错，很多功能，分布式构建等等。我不知道它的可扩展性是什么。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1524774|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/|1|http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration^0|0|D|0|E|6|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

Thoughtworks <a href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/cruise-continuous-integration" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Cruise</a> is the commercial offspring of the <a href="http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CruiseControl</a> open source project. Looks very nice, lots of features, distributed builds etc. I don't know what it's extendability is.

blocks|key|1740043|text|我们一直在使用Automated+Build+Studio，并且对它非常满意。它是一个windows应用程序，所以你会被困在windows+build服务器上，但从好的方面来说，它非常容易设置、维护和使用。您可以通过点击从组件构建您的流程，如果没有组件满足您的需求，则可以使用脚本。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1740044|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.automatedqa.com/products/abs/^0|7|M|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

We've been using <a href="http://www.automatedqa.com/products/abs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Automated Build Studio</a> and have been pretty happy with it. It's a windows app, so you're stuck on a windows build server, but on the plus side it's super easy to set up, maintain and use. You build your process from components via point and click, and can use scripting if none of the components meet your needs.

blocks|key|1525605|text|在我使用过的为数不多的几个版本中，Buildbot是最强大、最灵活的。不过，这并不是最漂亮的，如果这对你很重要的话。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1525606|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://buildbot.net/^0|H|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Of the few that I've used, <a href="http://buildbot.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Buildbot</a> stands out as the most powerful and flexible. It's not the prettiest, though, if that matters to you.

blocks|key|1525757|text|我用过竹子和Hudson，我推荐Hudson。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1525758|它们都很棒，但Hudson有更好的报告支持，例如在Hudson中发布覆盖报告等要容易得多。|1525759|这种情况在不久的将来可能会改变，但尽管有与JIRA等的集成和统计数据，Hudson在易用性和第三方支持方面还是更好的，而不考虑美元金额(它是免费的，而竹子不是)。|1525760|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I've administered both Bamboo and Hudson, and I would recommend Hudson.

They are both great, but Hudson has better report support, for instance publishing your coverage reports etc. is so much easier inside Hudson.

This is likely to change in the near future, but despite Bamboo's integration w/ JIRA etc. and it's statistics, Hudson, for ease of use and third-party support, is better regardless of dollar amount (it is free, Bamboo is not).

blocks|key|1525849|text|我们也使用Hudson，如果不是经济衰退，我们可能会使用竹子和大多数Atlassian产品(竹子，Crucible，Confluence)和JIRA。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1525850|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

We use Hudson too and if it wasn't the recession, we would probably use Bamboo and most of the Atlassian products(Bamboo, Crucible, Confluence) together with JIRA.

blocks|key|1524941|text|我将Continuum用于我的持续集成服务器。没有其他原因，除了我要雇佣一位在上一次任务中使用过的开发经理之外，所以选择我们中至少有一人有经验的东西似乎是有意义的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1524942|在选择Continuum之前，我有一个初级开发人员花了两周时间尝试让CruiseControl运行起来。然而，我们让Continuum+1.0先运行。|1524943|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://continuum.apache.org/^0|2|9|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

I use <a href="http://continuum.apache.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Continuum</a> for my continuous integration server. No reason other than I was going to hire a development manager who had used at his last assignment so it seemed to make sense to pick something at least one of us was experienced with.

Prior to picking Continuum I had a junior developer spend two weeks trying to get CruiseControl going. However, we got Continuum 1.0 to run first go.

blocks|key|1740093|text|我们正在使用Zutubi+Pulse，它对我们来说非常好用。它非常容易使用，ant有许多高级功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1740094|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.zutubi.com/^0|6|C|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

We are using <a href="http://www.zutubi.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Zutubi Pulse</a> and it works great for us.
It's very easy to use ant has many advanced features.

blocks|key|1740225|text|我们使用StarTeam，在Hudson和CruiseControl.NET之间，CC.NET在与StarTeam集成时有一些错误。它似乎无法识别我们在配置文件中定义的工作区。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1740226|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

We use StarTeam and between Hudson and CruiseControl.NET,CC.NET has some bugs when integrating with StarTeam. It does not seem to recognize the workspace that we define in the config files.

blocks|key|1525326|text|去年在美国的一个会议上，我第一次听说邮控.net是在一个1小时的演讲中，在我回家的路上，我决定为我们的公司实施一个小型的POC，并在不到5个小时的时间内成功地完成了(包括我本可以完成的所有学习)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1525327|我之所以使用它，是因为我必须说，我对结果非常满意，也很容易操作，但也有一些缺点(例如，虽然你可以监控多个服务器，但缺乏跨服务器规模的任务分发)我发现其中一个实现中有一个bug，因为它是一个开源的，我可以非常快地修复它(巨大的优势)-我在codeplex中创建了一个小项目来包含我的修复，然后我将它们贡献给社区作为签入。我强烈建议你看看这个平台，如果你能说出你真正需要的东西，那就更好了。|1525328|1：http://www.codeplex.com/DavidovitzCCE项目|offset|length|1525329|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.codeplex.com/DavidovitzCCE^0|0|0|2|11|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Last year on the a conference in the USA i first heard about Cruise Control .net on a 1 hour presentation, on my way home in the plain i decided to implement a small POC for our company and succcesfuly done it in less than 5 hours (including all the learning i could have done).

I am using it since than and i must say that i am very pleased with the results, and ease of operation,
There are some drawback (E.g. lack of distribution of task across servers scale although you can monitor several servers)
i found a a bug in one of the implementation and because it is an open source i could have fixed it very quickly (big advantage) - i created a little [project][1] in codeplex to contain my fixes before i contribute them to the community as a check in.
I highly encourage you to look at this platform, also it would be nice if you can say what you actually need.

[1]: <a href="http://www.codeplex.com/DavidovitzCCE" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.codeplex.com/DavidovitzCCE</a> project

blocks|key|1525933|text|在Windows+boxes上，CruiseControl.NET比最初的基于Java的要有效得多。特别是当专用构建服务器还不可用的时候。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1525934|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

CruiseControl.NET is much more effective on Windows boxes then the original Java based one. Especially when dedicated build server is not available yet.

blocks|key|1741105|text|为什么你不使用托管CI服务，那么你就不必担心维护、成本等问题了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1741106|MikeCI是一个hosted+CI+service，它将你的构建托管在亚马逊EC2中，每月只需10美元，比维护你自己的CI服务器便宜得多。|offset|length|1741107|试一试。|1741108|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.mikeci.com/^0|0|9|H|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Why don't you use a hosted CI service then you don't have to worry about maintenance, costs etc. 

MikeCI is a <a href="http://www.mikeci.com" rel="nofollow">hosted CI service</a> which hosts your builds in the Amazon EC2 and for just $10 per month is a hell of a lot cheaper than maintaining your own CI server.

Give it a go.

blocks|key|1526070|text|考虑在fazend.com上提供免费的托管CI服务。它支持ant。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1526071|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.fazend.com/^0|T|3|3|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]]|D|@$9|Q|A|R|1|S]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]]]

Consider a free hosted CI service at <a href="http://www.fazend.com" rel="nofollow">fazend.com</a>. It supports <code>ant</code>.

My company is considering changing continuous integration servers (I won't say which one we have now, so I won't skew your responses in anyway :) ) I wondering if anybody has any recommendations? Best user experience, level of difficulty to maintain, etc...

Our code is all in java, and we use ANT as a build tool.

Continuous Integration Servers

服务器

Windows

Java

我的公司正在考虑更换持续集成服务器(我不会说我们现在有哪一个，所以我也不会歪曲你的回答:)我想知道是否有人有什么建议？最好的用户体验，维护的难度，等等。我们的代码都是用java编写的，我们使用ANT作为构建工具。

问持续集成服务器
EN

回答 20

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问持续集成服务器EN

回答 20

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问持续集成服务器
EN