blocks|key|1750843|text|无论你走哪条路，都要收取合理的价格，使其易于激活，提供免费的次要更新，并且永远不会停用他们的软件。如果你尊重你的用户，他们会奖励你的。尽管如此，无论你做什么，总会有人盗版它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1750844|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Whatever route you go, charge a fair price, make it easy to activate, give free minor updates and never deactivate their software. If you treat your users with respect they'll reward you for it. Still, no matter what you do some people are going to end up pirating it.

blocks|key|1750985|text|别。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1750986|海盗就是海盗。无论你想出什么解决方案，它都会被破解。|1750987|另一方面，你的实际付费客户是那些因垃圾而感到不便的人。|1750988|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Don't.

Pirates will pirate. No matter what solution you come up with, it can and will be cracked.

On the other hand, your actual, paying customers are the ones who are being inconvenienced by the crap.

blocks|key|1751092|text|微软的软件许可方案对于一个小企业来说是非常昂贵的。如果你想自己设置它，服务器的成本大约是12,000美元。我不推荐它是为了假装用心。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751093|我们实际上只是在我们的产品中实现了Intellilock。它可以让你决定你想要的许可证有多严格，而且它也非常有成本效益。此外，它还做混淆、编译器预防等工作。|offset|length|1751094|我看到小企业/医疗企业使用的另一个很好的解决方案是SoloServer。它更像是一个电子商务和许可证控制系统。它的可配置性很强，可能有点太复杂了。但据我所知，它做得很好。|1751095|我以前也用过Desaware+license系统的.net。与上面两个相比，它是一个相当轻量级的系统。就加密方面而言，它是一个非常好的许可证控制系统。但它是一个非常低级的API，在这个API中，你必须实现你的应用程序实际使用的几乎所有东西。|1751096|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.eziriz.com/intellilock.htm|1|http://www.softwarekey.com/swk_products/solo/server/|2|http://www.desaware.com/support/faq/licensing/index.aspx^0|0|H|B|0|0|P|A|1|0|6|G|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$D|11|E|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@$D|15|E|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|U]]]]

The Microsoft Software License scheme is crazy expensive for a small business. The server cost is around $12,000 if you want to set it up yourself. I don't recommend it for the feint of heart.

We actually just implemented <a href="http://www.eziriz.com/intellilock.htm" rel="noreferrer">Intellilock</a> in our product. It lets you have all of the decisions for how strict you want your license to be, and it is very cost effective as well. In addition it does obfuscation, compiler prevention, etc.

Another good solution I have seen small/med businesses use is <a href="http://www.softwarekey.com/swk_products/solo/server/" rel="noreferrer">SoloServer</a>. It is much more of an ecommerce and license control system. It is very configurable to the point of maybe a little too complex. But it does a very good job from what I have heard.

I have also used the <a href="http://www.desaware.com/support/faq/licensing/index.aspx" rel="noreferrer">Desaware license</a> system for dot net in the past. It is a pretty lightweight system compared to the two above. It is a very good license control system in terms of cryptographically sound. But it is a very low level API in which you have to implement almost everything your app will actually use.

blocks|key|1536009|text|数字“版权”管理是业界最大的单一软件蛇油产品。借用经典密码学的一页，典型的场景是Alice想要向Bob发送一条消息，而Charlie却无法阅读它。DRM不起作用，因为在它的应用程序中，Bob和Charlie是同一个人！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536010|你最好问一个相反的问题，那就是“我如何让人们购买我的软件而不是偷走它？”这是一个非常宽泛的问题。但它通常是从做研究开始的。你找出谁购买了你想要销售的软件类型，然后生产出对这些人有吸引力的软件。|1536011|另一个解决办法是将更新/附加组件限制为仅合法副本。这可以是像在购买交易期间收到的订单码一样简单的东西。|1536012|看看Stardock软件、WindowBlinds和“太阳帝国之罪”等游戏的开发商，后者没有数字版权管理，从200万美元的预算中获得了可观的利润。|1536013|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Digital "Rights" Management is the single biggest software snake-oil product in the industry. To borrow a page from classic cryptography, the typical scenario is that Alice wants to get a message to Bob without Charlie being able to read it. DRM doesn't work because in its application, Bob and Charlie are the same person!

You would be better off asking the inverse question, which is "How do I get people to buy my software instead of stealing it?" And that is a very broad question. But it generally starts by doing research. You figure out who buys the type of software you wish to sell, and then produce software that appeals to those people.

The additional prong to this is to limit updates/add-ons to legit copies only. This can be something as simple as an order code received during the purchase transaction.

Check out Stardock software, makers of WindowBlinds and games such as Sins of a Solar Empire, the latter has no DRM and turned a sizable profit off a $2M budget.

blocks|key|1750748|text|有几种方法，比如使用处理器ID来生成“激活密钥”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1750749|底线是，如果有人非常想要它--他们会对你拥有的任何保护进行逆向工程。|1750750|最安全的方法是在运行时使用在线验证或硬件hasp。|1750751|祝好运!|1750752|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

There are several methods, such as using the processor ID to generate an "activation key."

The bottom line is that if someone wants it bad enough -- they'll reverse engineer any protection you have.

The most failsafe methods are to use online verification at runtime or a hardware hasp.

Good luck!

blocks|key|1535854|text|只有像魔兽世界(WoW)这样的在线游戏才能做到这一点，每个人每次都必须连接到服务器，因此可以不断验证账户。没有其他方法适用于bean。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1535855|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Online-only games like World of Warcraft (WoW) have it made, everyone has to connect to the server every time and thus accounts can be constantly verified. No other method works for beans.

blocks|key|1535968|text|正如已经指出的，软件保护永远不能保证是万无一失的。你打算使用什么在很大程度上取决于你的目标受众。例如，游戏并不是你能够永远保护的东西。另一方面，服务器软件是一种不太可能在互联网上分发的软件，原因有很多(考虑到产品的渗透率和责任；大公司不想为盗版软件承担责任，盗版者只关心需求足够大的东西)。老实说，对于一个备受瞩目的游戏，最好的解决方案可能是自己播种洪流(秘密地！)并以某种方式对其进行修改(例如，在播放两周后，它会弹出消息，告诉您请考虑通过购买正版副本来支持开发人员)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1535969|如果你采取了保护措施，请记住两件事。首先，较低的价格将补充任何版权保护，使人们更倾向于支付购买价格。其次，保护不能妨碍用户--参见孢子最近的例子。|1535970|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

As has been pointed out, software protection is never guaranteed to be foolproof. What you intend to use depends largely on your target audience. A game, for instance, is not something you are going to be able to protect forever. A server software, on the other hand, is something far less likely to be distributed on the Internet, for a number of reasons (product penetration and liability come to mind; a large corporation does not want to be held liable for bootleg software, and the pirates only bother with things in large-enough demand). In all honesty, for a high-profile game, the best solution is probably to seed the torrent yourself (clandestinely!) and modify it in some way (for instance, so that after two weeks of play it pops up with messages telling you to please consider supporting the developers by purchasing a legitimate copy).

If you put protection in place, bear two things in mind. First, a lower price will supplement any copy protection by making people more inclined to pay the purchase price. Secondly, the protection must not get in the way of users - see Spore for a recent example.

blocks|key|1536212|text|DRM这个，DRM那个--那些把DRM强加到他们的项目中的出版商，他们这么做是因为它有利可图。他们的经济学家基于我们谁也看不到的数据得出了这一结论。"DRM是邪恶的“巨魔走得有点太远了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536213|对于低能见度的产品，简单的互联网激活将阻止随意复制。任何其他的复制对你的底线来说都可能是微不足道的。|1536214|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

DRM this, DRM that - publishers who force DRM on their projects are doing it because it's profitable. Their economists are concluding this on data which none of us will ever see. The "DRM is evil" trolls are going a little too far.

For a low-visibility product, a simple internet activation is going to stop casual copying. Any other copying is likely negligible to your bottom line.

blocks|key|1751462|text|即使你使用了某种生物指纹认证，也会有人找到破解它的方法。确实没有什么实际的方法可以绕过它。与其试图让你的软件防黑客攻击，不如想想通过增加额外的版权保护会带来多少额外的收入，而不是实施它所需要的时间和金钱。在某种程度上，使用不那么严格的版权保护方案会变得更便宜。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751463|这取决于你的软件产品到底是什么，但一种可能性是将程序的“有价值”部分移出软件，并将其置于你的独占控制之下。您将收取适当的软件费用(主要用于支付印刷和分发成本)，并将从外部组件中获得收入。例如，一个杀毒软件以低价出售(或与其他产品免费捆绑)，但出售其病毒定义更新服务的订阅。在这种模式下，订阅你的更新服务的盗版拷贝不会造成太大的经济损失。随着应用程序“在云中”的日益普及，这种方法变得更容易实现；在您的云上托管应用程序，并向用户收取云访问费用。这不会阻止某些人重新实现他们自己的云来消除对您的服务的需求，但是这样做所涉及的时间和精力很可能会超过收益(如果您保持您的定价模型合理的话)。|1751464|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Even if you used some kind of biometric fingerprint authentication, someone would find a way to crack it. There's really no practical way around that. Instead of trying to make your software hack-proof, think about how much extra revenue will be brought in by adding additional copy protection vs. the amount of time and money it will take to implement it. At some point, it gets to be cheaper to go with a less rigorous copy protection scheme.

It depends on what exactly your software product is, but one possibility is to move the "valuable" part of the program out of the software and keep it under your exclusive control. You would charge a modest fee for the software (mostly to cover print and distribution costs) and would generate your revenue from the external component. For example, an anti-virus program that is sold for cheap (or bundled for free with other products) but sells subscriptions to its virus definitions update service. With that model, a pirated copy that subscribes to your update service wouldn't represent much of a financial loss. With the increasing popularity of applications "in the cloud", this method is becoming easier to implement; host the application on your cloud, and charge users for cloud access. This doesn't stop someone from re-implementing their own cloud to eliminate the need for your service, but the time and effort involved in doing so would most likely outweigh the benefits (if you keep your pricing model reasonable).

blocks|key|1750805|text|如果你对保护你打算卖给消费者的软件感兴趣，我会推荐任何一种许可证密钥生成库(谷歌搜索许可证密钥生成)。通常，用户必须给你某种种子，比如他们的电子邮件地址或名字，然后他们就会拿回注册码。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1750806|有几家公司将托管和分发您的软件，或者提供一个完整的安装/购买应用程序，您可以将其与之集成并自动执行此操作，这可能不会给您带来额外的成本。|1750807|我已经将软件卖给了消费者，我发现这是成本/易用性/保护之间的恰当平衡。|1750808|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

If your interested in protecting software that you intend to sell to consumers I would recommend any of a variety of license key generating libraries (Google search on license key generation). Usually the user has to give you some sort of seed like their email address or name and they get back the registration code.

Several companies will either host and distribute your software or provide a complete installation/purchase application that you can integrate with and do this automatically probably at no additional cost to you.

I have sold software to consumers and I find this the right balance of cost/ease of use/protection.

blocks|key|1536275|text|最简单，也是最好的解决方案，就是预先向他们收费。设定一个对你和他们都有效的价格。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536276|要求付费客户在他们已经付款后证明他们是付费客户，这只会让他们很生气。实现代码使您的软件不能运行，浪费您的时间和金钱，并为合法客户带来错误和烦恼。你最好把这些时间花在制造更好的产品上。|1536277|许多游戏/等将“保护”第一个版本，然后由于与真实客户的兼容性问题而在第一个补丁中放弃保护。如果你坚持一定程度的保护，这并不是一个不合理的策略。|1536278|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

The simple, and best solution, is just to charge them up front. Set a price that works for you and them.

Asking paying customers to prove that they are paying customers after they've already paid just pisses them off. Implementing the code to make your software not run wastes your time and money, and introduces bugs and annoyances for legitimate customers. You'd be better off spending that time making a better product.

Lots of games/etc will "protect" the first version, then drop the protections in the first patch due to compatibility problems with real customers. It's not an unreasonable strategy if you insist on a modicum of protection.

blocks|key|1751287|text|几乎所有的版权保护都是无效的，而且是可用性的噩梦。其中一些做法，比如在客户的机器上放置root-kit，完全是不道德的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751288|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Almost all copy-protection is both ineffective, and a usability nightmare. Some of it, such as putting root-kits on your customers' machines becomes downright unethical

blocks|key|1751350|text|我建议简单的激活密钥(即使你知道它可能被破坏)，你真的不希望你的软件妨碍你的用户，否则他们会简单地推开它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751351|确保他们可以重新下载软件，我建议建立一个网页，在那里他们可以登录并下载您的软件，只有在他们付费后(是的，他们应该能够直接下载他们想要的次数，而不会有任何关于您为什么的问题)。|1751352|把你的付费用户推到最重要的位置，没有什么比当你是合法用户时被指控为罪犯更令人恼火的了(DVD的反盗版警告)。|1751353|您可以添加在线时根据服务器检查密钥的服务，如果两个不同的IP正在使用相同的密钥，则会弹出购买另一个license的建议。|1751354|但请不要停用它，它可能是一个快乐的用户向朋友展示你的软件！|1751355|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

I suggest simple activation key (even if you know that it can be broken), you really don't want your software to get in your users way, or they'll simply push it away.

Make sure that they can re-download the software, I suggest a web page where they can logging and download your software only after they paid (and yes they should be able to download as many times they wish it, directly, without a single question about why on your part).

Thrust your paid users above all, there is nothing more irritating that being accused from being a criminal when you are a legit users (DVD's anti-piracy warnings anyone).

You can add a service that checks the key against a server when online, and in case of two different IPs are using the same key, popup a suggestion to buy another license.

But please don't inactivate it, it might be a happy user showing your software to a friend!!!!

blocks|key|1536095|text|我同意很多人的观点，任何基于软件的版权保护方案都无法阻止熟练的软件盗版者。对于基于.NET的商业软件，微软软件许可保护(SLP)是一种价格非常合理的解决方案。支持限时和浮动licenses。他们的定价是每月10美元%2B每次激活5美元，保护组件似乎如广告所说的那样工作。不过，这是一个相当新的产品，所以买家要当心。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536096|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I agree with a lot of posters that no software-based copy protection scheme will deter against a skilled software pirate. For commercial .NET based software Microsoft Software License Protection (SLP) is a very reasonably priced solution. It supports time-limited and floating licenses. Their pricing starts at $10/month + $5 per activation and the protection components seem to work as advertised. It's a fairly new offering, though, so buyer beware.

blocks|key|1536439|text|我们使用我们自己的许可系统来许可我们的商业软件--这就是我们正在销售的(许可管理工具)。我们通常销售订阅许可证，但如果我们愿意，也可以根据使用情况销售。到目前为止，它对我们是安全的:+www.agilis-sw.com|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536440|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

We license our commercial software using our own licensing system - which is what we are selling (license management tools). We generally sell subscription licenses, but can also sell based on usage if we wish. It has been secure for us so far: www.agilis-sw.com

blocks|key|1536513|text|如果您是一名软件开发人员，可能的解决方案之一是将元数据直接嵌入到您的产品中。查看一下来自theredsunrise的实例销毁安全工具。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1536514|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

If you are a software developer, one of the possible solutions is to embed a meta data direct into your product. Check out for an instance Destruction Security tool from theredsunrise.

I am curious about how do you protect your software against cracking, hacking etc.

Do you employ some kind of serial number check? Hardware keys? 

Do you use any third-party solutions?

How do you go about solving licensing issues? (e.g. managing floating licenses)

EDIT: I'm not talking any open source, but strictly commercial software distribution...

How do you protect your software from illegal distribution?

软件开发

服务器

编译器

我很好奇你如何保护你的软件免受破解，黑客攻击等等。你们有没有使用某种序列号检查？硬件钥匙？您是否使用任何第三方解决方案？您如何着手解决许可问题？(例如，管理浮动许可证)编辑:我说的不是任何开源，而是严格意义上的商业软件发行……

问您如何保护您的软件免受非法分发？
EN

回答 16

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问您如何保护您的软件免受非法分发？EN

回答 16

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问您如何保护您的软件免受非法分发？
EN