blocks|key|4604100|text|很抱歉，我没有从问题中理解下面的事情。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4604101|4604102|file-migration当前的格式是什么？|unordered-list-item|4604103|4604104|如果它以(DITA)+XML的形式出现(或者可以迁移到XML)，则以下过程可能是一种解决方案：|4604105|4604106|导入将(DITA)可扩展标记语言导入到版本控制系统中；|4604107|编辑从那里很容易被多个人修改；|4604108|导出始终是可能的，从CVS+system;|4604109|Publishing自动生成(DITA+Open+Toolkit);|offset|length|4604110|Localization支持将分支用于不同的languages;|4604111|Tagging标签最终发布，当它发布时。|4604112|4604113|另请参阅What+is+the+recommended+tool+chain+for+formatting+XML+DocBook?，因为这些建议可用于DITA工具链。|4604114|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/122752/what-is-the-recommended-toolchain-for-formatting-xml-docbook^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|F|H|0|0|0|0|0|4|1Q|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|E|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|E|7|1J|8|@]|9|@$R|1K|S|1L|1|1M]]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|E|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|E|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|-4|5|6|7|1P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@$R|1R|S|1S|1|1T]]|A|$]]|$1|10|3|-4|5|6|7|1U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|11|$12|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|17]]|18|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|19]]]]

Sorry for not understanding the following thing, from the question.

<ul>
<li>[file-migration] What is the current format? </li>
</ul>

If it comes as (DITA) XML (or can be migrated to XML), the following procedure might be a solution:

<ul>
<li>[Import] Import the (DITA) XML into a Version Control System;</li>
<li>[Edit] From there it is easy to modify by multiple people;</li>
<li>[Export] Always possible, from CVS system;</li>
<li>[Publishing] Automatic PDF generation (<a href="http://dita-ot.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DITA Open Toolkit</a>);</li>
<li>[Localization support] Use branches for the different languages;</li>
<li>[Tagging] Tag a final release, when it is is published.</li>
</ul>

See also the <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/122752/what-is-the-recommended-toolchain-for-formatting-xml-docbook">What is the recommended tool chain for formatting XML DocBook?</a> as these same suggestions can be used for a DITA tool chain.

blocks|key|4604141|text|IBM在Arbortext上构建了DITA。Arbortext是唯一一家成为OASIS+DITA技术委员会创始成员的供应商，他们作为PTC继续这一活动。(Arbortext于2005年被PTC收购)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4604142|Arbortext还支持DocBook+(从概念开始)、S1000D和自定义文档类型，无需对应用程序进行自定义。|4604143|很高兴在线下讨论更多这方面的内容。|4604144|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

IBM built DITA on Arbortext. Arbortext was the only vendor to be a charter member of the OASIS DITA Technical Committee and they continue that activity as PTC. (Arbortext was acquired by PTC in 2005). 

Arbortext also supports DocBook (since conception), S1000D, and custom doctypes with no customization of the application required.

Happy to talk more about this offline.

blocks|key|3137051|text|在这样的论坛上根据问题选择像Component+CMS这样的东西有点危险(非常危险)，但只要你在问，你可以看看下面这样的东西:+SDL+Trisoft，IXIASOFT+DITA+CMS，Vasont，XDocs，或者DITA+Exchange。CCMS系统在价格和功能上都有很大的不同，因此如下所示：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3137052|users|3137053|Distribution+of+users+of+users|unordered-list-item|3137054|
|3137055|Distribution+of+users|3137056|3137057|IT+'religious‘(例如，SharePoint上瘾、Linux)和DITA功能的使用(如Conref、SubjectScheme|3137058|3137059|Versioning+requirements|3137060|3137061|Translation+KeyRef+|3137062|
)的使用|3137063|都会对决策过程产生很大影响。我们倾向于在做出可靠的建议之前花时间与客户在一起，所以这只是让你开始研究的东西。|3137064|你可能知道Arbortext根本不是一个组件CMS，它是一个编辑器。|3137065|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|H|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|F|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|H|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|F|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|H|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|F|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|-4|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|10|$]]

It's a bit dangerous (a lot dangerous) to be choosing something like a Component CMS based on questions on a forum like this, but as long as you're asking you could look at things like: SDL Trisoft, IXIASOFT DITA CMS, Vasont, XDocs, or DITA Exchange to get an idea of what is out there. CCMS systems are vastly different from each other both in price and functionality, so things like:

<ul>
<li>Number of users</li>
<li>Distribution of users</li>
<li>IT 'religious affiliations' (e.g. SharePoint addiction, Linux)</li>
<li>Use of DITA features like Conref, KeyRef, SubjectScheme</li>
<li>Versioning flexibility requirements</li>
<li>Translation management</li>
</ul>

will all greatly affect the decision making process. We tend to spend time with a client before making solid recommendations so this is simply something to get you started in your research. 

PS - As you may know Arbortext is not a Component CMS at all, it's an editor.

blocks|key|4604177|text|如果你还在寻找选择，你应该查看easyDITA+(http://easydita.com)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4604178|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://easydita.com/^0|P|J|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

If you are still looking for options you should check out easyDITA (<a href="http://easydita.com" rel="nofollow">http://easydita.com</a>)

blocks|key|820814|text|当您查看CCMS时，请确保考虑以下因素：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|820815|820816|将内容放入系统有多容易？|unordered-list-item|820817|将内容从系统中取出有多容易？|820818|系统是否使用专有机制进行筛选，而不是支持属于OASIS标准的DITAVAL？|820819|820820|DITA的优点之一是，如果您遵循该标准并且不使用专有机制，则可以轻松地与业务合作伙伴交换内容，如果需要，可以转移到另一个CCMS，等等。|820821|较旧的CCMS对某些事情使用专有机制。这是完全可以理解的，因为它们是在DITA成为标准之前开发的，具有必须支持的实现的老客户也是如此。|820822|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$]]

As you are looking at CCMS, be sure that you consider the following factors:

<ul>
<li>How easy is it to get your content into the system?</li>
<li>How easy is it to get your content out of the system?</li>
<li>Does the system use proprietary mechanisms for filtering, rather than support for DITAVAL that is part of the OASIS standards?</li>
</ul>

Part of the beauty of DITA is that if you follow the standard and do not use proprietary mechanisms, you easily can exchange content with business partners, move to another CCMS, if you needed, and so forth.

Older CCMS use proprietary mechanisms for some things. It's entirely understandable, since they were developed before DITA was a standard, and so have legacy customers with implementations that they must support.

I am looking for a Component CMS solution that is compatible with IBM's DITA in terms of preserving the document hierarchy/structure created in DITA (ditamaps).

I am not necessarily looking for an open source solution.

Other requirements would be: 
 - file migration 
 - XML support (ingestion, editing, export) 
 - PDF support (publishing) 
 - Workflow management 
 - Localization support (managing versions across locales) 
 - Output tagging

Can you suggest a component CMS that is compatible with IBM's DITA

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我正在寻找一种组件CMS解决方案，它在保留在DITA (ditamaps)中创建的文档层次/结构方面与IBM的DITA兼容。我不一定是在寻找一个开源的解决方案。其他要求包括：文件迁移XML支持(摄取、编辑、导出)PDF支持标签支持(跨locales)Output tagging管理版本

问您能推荐一个与IBM的DITA兼容的组件CMS吗
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问您能推荐一个与IBM的DITA兼容的组件CMS吗EN