blocks|key|1538937|text|“落后”是一个相当概括的说法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1538938|imho，VSTS，即使在2010年，也无法与LoadRunner在系统设置和结果分析方面的易用性相匹敌。|1538939|但是，VSTS+Test+Edition的定价模式与LoadRunner不同。尽管微软对每个模拟的VSTS终端用户收费较低，但每个脚本开发人员为每个VSTS桌面许可证支付4,000美元(或更多)。LoadRunner仅按服务器上的vuser收费，不需要许可证即可在桌面上创建和测试脚本。|1538940|但这两种产品的主要成本都围绕着创建和调试脚本所需的技能和时间。尽管LoadRunner+(默认情况下)使用来自特定于供应商的库的C语言脚本函数，但LoadRunner确实提供了一种机制，可以避免本地C程序员面临的内存管理和字符串处理麻烦。|1538941|LoadRunner和VSTS都面临着提供能够识别快速变化的前端RIA库(JavaScript/AJAX、jQuery、Telerik、Infragistics、WPF、Silverlight、Adobe等)的机制的挑战。新的库和版本正在以比HP提供的识别/脚本生成功能更快的速度出现。|1538942|尽管惠普LoadRunner声称它可以模仿浏览器处理JavaScript的方式，但许多人在让它工作时遇到了困难。|1538943|因此，性能脚本开发人员通常需要了解这些不同的库是如何在更深层次(更低层次)上工作的，这是大多数创建应用程序的开发人员所不具备的。|1538944|http://wilsonmar.com/ajax_rec.htm详细地解释了这一点。|offset|length|1538945|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://wilsonmar.com/ajax_rec.htm^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|X|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@$P|17|Q|18|1|19]]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|S|$T|$5|U|V|W|A|$X|Y]]]]

"lag behind" is quite a generalization. 

imho, VSTS, even at 2010, does not match LoadRunner's ease-of-use in system setup and power of results analysis.

However, VSTS Test Edition has a different pricing model than LoadRunner. Although Microsoft charges less for each VSTS end-user emulated, each script developer pays $4,000 (or so) for each VSTS desktop license. LoadRunner charges only by vuser on the server and does not require a license to create and test scripts at the desktop.

But the main cost with both products revolve around the amount of skill and time needed to create and debug scripts. Although LoadRunner (by default) uses C-language script functions from a vendor-specific library, LoadRunner does provide a mechanism that avoids the memory management and string handling hassles faced by native C programmers.

Both LoadRunner and VSTS face the challenge of providing mechanisms for being able to recognize the fast-changing landscape of front-end RIA libraries (JavaScript/AJAX, jQuery, Telerik, Infragistics, WPF, Silverlight, Adobe, etc.). New libraries and versions are coming out at a faster rate than HP can provide recognition / script generation capabilities.

Although HP LoadRunner claims it can emulate how browsers process JavaScript, many have had difficulty with making it work. 

Consequently, performance script developers often need to have an understanding of how these various libraries work at a deeper level (more low-level) that most developers creating applications.

<a href="http://wilsonmar.com/ajax_rec.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://wilsonmar.com/ajax_rec.htm</a> explains this in excruciating detail.

blocks|key|133515|text|VS2010与Silverlight、AJAX和RIA中使用的一系列协议完美地结合在一起。AJAX支持是开箱即用的，但是对二进制有效负载编辑和参数化的支持是通过web插件提供的|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|133516|有关VS2010测试工具的更多资源，请访问http://blogs.msdn.com/anutthara/pages/resources-for-test-tools-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx。|offset|length|133517|133518|Anu|unordered-list-item|133519|133520|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://blogs.msdn.com/anutthara/pages/resources-for-test-tools-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx^0|0|L|2H|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$D|U|E|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|R]]]]

VS 2010 works beautifully with Silverlight, AJAX and a bunch of protocols used in RIAs. AJAX support is out of the box, however support for binary payload editing and parameterization is provided via a web plugin 

Check out <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/anutthara/pages/resources-for-test-tools-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://blogs.msdn.com/anutthara/pages/resources-for-test-tools-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx</a> for more resources on VS 2010 Test Tools. 

<ul>
<li>Anu </li>
</ul>

blocks|key|332813|text|"VS2010与Silverlight配合使用时效果很好“|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|332814|这是不准确的。|332815|VS2010还不支持Silverlight。这是根据微软的说法。http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vsautotest/thread/49a07111-7d41-435f-8ae1-114a281fa86b|offset|length|332816|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vsautotest/thread/49a07111-7d41-435f-8ae1-114a281fa86b^0|0|0|W|2P|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

"VS2010 works beautifully with Silverlight"

That is not accurate.

VS2010 does not support Silverlight yet. That is according to Microsoft.
<a href="http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vsautotest/thread/49a07111-7d41-435f-8ae1-114a281fa86b" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/vsautotest/thread/49a07111-7d41-435f-8ae1-114a281fa86b</a>

blocks|key|133568|text|我会将LoadRunner和Microsoft+VSTS+(Visual+Studio+Test+Suite)进行比较，只是在网络(HTTP)协议方面，这是VSTS唯一支持的协议。将VSTS用于任何其他协议，我称之为“工具滥用”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|133569|我在许多项目中都使用过这两个工具，我必须说，编写VSTS+WebTests是一件很愉快的事情。如果测试只被记录为一个WebTests+(不需要从它们生成代码)，那么维护就变得非常容易。|133570|我只是爱上了提取规则和插件。它提供了非常可移植的代码片段，可以在其他项目中重用。在我的“工具箱”中有一个小的提取规则存储库，我可以关联大多数脚本，而不需要编写一行代码，我个人认为这是一个令人难以置信的。|133571|这是一个使用Fiddler的post+about+recording,+correlating+and+parametrizing+VSTS+WebTests的链接。|offset|length|133572|另一方面，LoadRunner以结果分析的方式赢得了胜利。我认为微软要赶上惠普的工具还需要几年时间(如果有的话)。|133573|谢谢，Maciej|133574|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.bugtrap.co.uk/2010/06/using-fiddler-with-visual-studio-team.html^0|0|0|0|E|1T|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$H|Z|I|10|1|11]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|A|$T|U]]]]

I would compare LoadRunner to Microsoft VSTS (Visual Studio Test Suite) only in terms of Web (HTTP) protocol which is the only one VSTS supports. Using VSTS for any other protocol I would call "tool abuse".

I've used both tools on many project and I must say that VSTS WebTests are a pleasure to write. If the tests are recorded only as a WebTests (without generating code from them) maintenance becomes very easy.

I just fall in love with extraction rules and plug-ins. It provides very portable code fragments which could be reused on other projects. With a small extraction rules repository in my "toolbox" I can correlate most of the scripts without writing a single line of code which I personally think is an incredible.

Here is a link to a <a href="http://www.bugtrap.co.uk/2010/06/using-fiddler-with-visual-studio-team.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">post about recording, correlating and parametrizing VSTS WebTests</a> using Fiddler.

On the other hand LoadRunner wins by a long shot is results analysis. I think it will be few years before Microsoft catch up with HP's tool (if ever)

Thanks,
Maciej

I have had this debate with some peers off and on for a while. I am certified in the HP tools, but have been spending more and more time with VSTS Test Edition 2008. I am looking for opinions on what people think of the future of both products and how they compete.

LoadRunner's strengths include its vast array of protocols supported. Unfortunately since HP took over from Mercury, they are beginning to lag behind, especially in the new internet spaces.

VSTS Test, once very limited, is now quite impressive, especially in 2010. I don't know if it makes business sense, but I would love for VSTS Test to take on some additional protocols. Many of my clients would like to move away from HP and their licensing costs.

Finally, I am looking for good resources for VSTS Test. I have been playing with it, but would like to see some dedicated courses/material, instead of just a part of the larger VSTS.

Thanks!

VSTS Test Edition or HP's LoadRunner?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我和一些同行断断续续地进行了一段时间的辩论。我通过了HP工具的认证，但我花了越来越多的时间使用VSTS Test Edition 2008。我正在寻求人们对这两种产品的未来以及它们如何竞争的看法。LoadRunner的优势包括其支持的大量协议。不幸的是，自从惠普从墨丘利手中接过手来，他们开始落后了，尤其是在新的互联网领...

问VSTS测试版还是惠普的LoadRunner？
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问VSTS测试版还是惠普的LoadRunner？EN