blocks|key|500249|text|要找到这方面的好信息真的很困难，甚至更难找到最新的信息。其中大部分是关于.NET+1.1或2.0的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|500250|无论如何，我会在这里提供一些你可能感兴趣的链接：|500251|http://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html+-采访Anders，C#编程语言的首席设计师|unordered-list-item|offset|length|500252|http://www.25hoursaday.com/CsharpVsJava.html+-+Dare+Obasanjo的“从Java的角度看C#”|500253|http://benpryor.com/blog/2006/05/04/jvm-vs-clr-memory-allocation/+-+JVM与CLR内存分配|500254|http://sharptoolbox.com/categories+-用于.NET的工具、库和框架的列表|500255|http://javatoolbox.com/categories+-用于J2EE的工具、库和框架的列表|500256|平台+-维基百科对Java和.NET的比较|500257|锐利+-维基百科对Java和C#的比较|500258|希望能帮上忙！我会继续更新这一点，无论何时我停下来一些有用的信息。|500259|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html|1|http://www.25hoursaday.com/CsharpVsJava.html|2|http://benpryor.com/blog/2006/05/04/jvm-vs-clr-memory-allocation/|3|http://sharptoolbox.com/categories|4|http://javatoolbox.com/categories|5|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_Java_and_.NET_platforms|6|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C_Sharp^0|0|0|0|12|0|0|0|18|1|0|0|1T|2|0|0|Y|3|0|0|X|4|0|0|2|5|0|0|2|6|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|1I|8|@]|9|@$G|1J|H|1K|1|1L]]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|1M|8|@]|9|@$G|1N|H|1O|1|1P]]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|F|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@$G|1R|H|1S|1|1T]]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|F|7|1U|8|@]|9|@$G|1V|H|1W|1|1X]]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|F|7|1Y|8|@]|9|@$G|1Z|H|20|1|21]]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|F|7|22|8|@]|9|@$G|23|H|24|1|25]]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|F|7|26|8|@]|9|@$G|27|H|28|1|29]]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|2A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|W|3|-4|5|6|7|2B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|X|$Y|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|13]]|14|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|15]]|16|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|17]]|18|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|19]]|1A|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|1B]]|1C|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|1D]]|1E|$5|Z|10|11|A|$12|1F]]]]

It´s really difficult to find good information about this, even more difficult finding up to date information. Most of it is about .NET 1.1 or 2.0.

Anyway, I will provide here some links that might be of your interest:

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.artima.com/intv/anders.html</a> - interview with Anders Hejlsberg, the lead designer of the C# programming language</li>
<li><a href="http://www.25hoursaday.com/CsharpVsJava.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.25hoursaday.com/CsharpVsJava.html</a> - Dare Obasanjo's "C# From a Java Developer's Perspective"</li>
<li><a href="http://benpryor.com/blog/2006/05/04/jvm-vs-clr-memory-allocation/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://benpryor.com/blog/2006/05/04/jvm-vs-clr-memory-allocation/</a> - JVM vs CLR memory allocation</li>
<li><a href="http://sharptoolbox.com/categories" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sharptoolbox.com/categories</a> - a list of tools, libraries &amp; frameworks for .NET</li>
<li><a href="http://javatoolbox.com/categories" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://javatoolbox.com/categories</a> - a list of tools, libraries &amp; frameworks for J2EE</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_Java_and_.NET_platforms" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_Java_and_.NET_platforms</a> - Wikipedia's comparison of Java (JVM) and .NET</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C_Sharp" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C_Sharp</a> - Wikipedia's comparison of Java and C#</li>
</ul>

Hope it helps! I will keep updating this whenever I stop by some useful info.

blocks|key|500297|text|我不知道有一个好的，清晰的图表，但我将冒昧地回答你的问题。(警告--我是一名J2EE开发人员，上一次使用微软编程是用经典的ASP和VB+6编写的。我无法评估MS技术，但我对很多类似的Java都有很好的理解。)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|500298|：WCF似乎是关于简化Web的。J2EE的等价物是Apache，它使用JAX-WS2.0规范中可用的注释来简化Web的创建。|unordered-list-item|500299|WPF：这个很简单。微软的技术看起来像是JavaServer面孔的直接翻版。我不能告诉你哪一个更好，但它们非常相似。编辑：I在这个问题上太快了--+在桌面上不能工作，就像WPF应该做的那样。底层技术是相似的，但JavaFX可能是更好的比较。|offset|length|style|BOLD|500300|JBoss+in+.NET：其他人可能想让我改邪归正，但我觉得说它不存在是相当安全的。想想看。您需要一个免费的、开放源码的产品来运行一个专有的、非免费的规范。如果您使用Microsoft，您就会被IIS困住，就像您被Windows困住一样。|500301|JVM与CLR：我发现了一篇文章，即可用的这里，它表明两者之间没有什么区别。我看到的这两者之间的许多争论集中在Windows作为一种服务器技术的弱点(真实的或被认为的)上。|500302|是Java世界所拥有的，而不是WF/WPF/WCF：在我看来，在这里，Java世界比女士有真正的好处--那里有无数的框架，所以您一定会找到适合您的需求的东西(免费的！)。您可以使用Spring或Struts2.0或Wicket。对于数据库层，您可以选择Hibernate或Ibatis。看看Web框架的这份清单。Java总共列出了9个框架。微软有一个:+WCF。|500303|LINQ的Java等效：同样，有人可以纠正我，但我不确定是否有类似的。优势微软。|500304|ADO.NET+Data+Services：这在Java中可以通过JPA和RESTful+Web服务实现，但我认为在MS世界中实现起来要容易一些。|500305|还有一个领域，我认为微软正在领先于Java社区:他们正在对函数式编程进行一些明智的投资，而Java的人则无谓地争论着向Java添加闭包的最佳方法。同样地，也有一些新兴的技术--+OSGi，也就是--来处理大量的Java框架所涉及的极其复杂的问题。因为MS对他们的领域有更严格的控制，所以他们更容易处理他们的各种组件。|500306|还有一些人的考虑:你能找到谁来工作什么技术，以及X的招聘成本和Y的招聘费用。但不管你选择什么，这都是真的。|500307|希望这能有所帮助！|500308|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=957341|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Web_service_Frameworks^0|0|0|0|3|1M|3|0|0|D|0|0|7|L|2|0|0|0|P|47|4|1|0|0|B|0|0|L|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|1C|8|@$G|1D|H|1E|I|J]|$G|1F|H|1G|I|J]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|D|7|1H|8|@$G|1I|H|1J|I|J]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|D|7|1K|8|@$G|1L|H|1M|I|J]]|9|@$G|1N|H|1O|1|1P]]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|D|7|1Q|8|@$G|1R|H|1S|I|J]]|9|@$G|1T|H|1U|1|1V]]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|D|7|1W|8|@$G|1X|H|1Y|I|J]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|D|7|1Z|8|@$G|20|H|21|I|J]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|22|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|W|3|X|5|6|7|23|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|6|7|24|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|10|3|-4|5|6|7|25|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|11|$12|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|17]]|18|$5|13|14|15|A|$16|19]]]]

I don't know of a good, clear chart, but I'll venture some answers to your questions. (Warning -- I'm a J2EE developer, and the last time I did Microsoft programming it was with classic ASP and VB 6. I won't be able to evaluate the MS technologies, but I do have a good sense of a lot of the Java equivalents.)

<ul>
<li>WCF: WCF seems to be about simplifying Web Services. The J2EE equivalent would be Apache CXF, which uses annotations available in the JAX-WS 2.0 spec to simplify the creation of Web Services.</li>
<li>WPF: This one's easy. Microsoft's technology looks like a straight-up rip-off of JavaServer Faces. I can't tell you which one is better, but they resemble each other a lot. EDIT: I was too quick off the mark with this one -- JSF doesn't work on the desktop, like WPF is supposed to. The underlying technologies are similar, but JavaFX may be the better comparison.</li>
<li>JBoss in .NET: Someone else might want to set me straight, but I feel fairly safe saying this doesn't exist. Think about it. You're asking for a free, open-source product to run a proprietary, non-free specification. If you go with Microsoft, you're stuck with IIS just as much as you're stuck with Windows.</li>
<li>JVM vs. CLR: I found a paper, available <a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=957341" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a>, that suggests there is little or no difference between the two. A lot of the argument between the two that I've seen centers on the weaknesses (real or perceived) of Windows as a server technology. </li>
<li>What the Java world has instead of WF/WPF/WCF: Now here's where, to my mind, the Java world has real benefits over MS. There are countless frameworks out there, so you're bound to find something that suits your needs (for free!). You can use Spring MVC or Struts 2.0 or Wicket. For your database layer, you have a choice of Hibernate or Ibatis. Look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Web_service_Frameworks" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this list</a> of Web Services frameworks. Java has a total of nine frameworks listed. Microsoft has one: WCF. </li>
<li>LINQ's Java Equivalent: Again, someone can correct me, but I'm not sure there is an equivalent. Advantage Microsoft.</li>
<li>ADO.NET Data Services: This is doable in Java through JPA and RESTful Web Services, but I imagine it's a little easier in the MS world to implement. </li>
</ul>

There's another area where I perceive Microsoft to be creeping ahead of the Java community: they're making some smart investments in functional programming, while Java folks are bickering pointlessly about the best way to add closures to Java. There are likewise some emerging technologies -- OSGi, namely -- to handle the overwhelming complexity involved in the sheer number of Java frameworks out there. Since MS has tighter control over their domain, it's easier for them to deal with their various components.

And then there are the human considerations: who you can find to work what technologies and how much hiring for X will cost versus hiring for Y. But that's true no matter what you choose.

Hope this helps!

blocks|key|2032831|text|海事组织有太多的Java框架。数十个Linux发行版也有同样的问题.|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2032832|当然，.NET也可以这么说，但更清楚一些。那是我的.02|2032833|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

IMO there are too many frameworks for Java. Same problem with the dozens of Linux Distributions...

Sure can say the same for .NET but it's just clearer. that is my .02

blocks|key|500331|text|在rtperson的帖子上：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|500332|.NET有NHibernate和iBatis.NET，似乎不如它们的iBatis.NET那样好，但足够好。|500333|事实上，在.NET端有很多开源项目:城堡项目(MVC，IoC)，NUnit，Spring.NET.让我们不要忘记Mono是核心.NET框架的开源实现。|500334|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

On rtperson's post:

.NET has NHibernate and iBatis.NET. Not as good as their Java counterparts, it seems, but good enough.

In fact, there are plenty of open-source projects on the .NET side: Castle Project (MVC, IoC), NUnit, Spring.NET... And let's not forget Mono as a open-source implementation of the core .NET framework.

blocks|key|2032857|text|你看过这些吗？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2032858|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET%255FFramework#.NET%255Fvs.%255FJava%255Fand%255FJava%255FEE|offset|length|2032859|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%255Fof%255Fthe%255FJava%255Fand%255F.NET%255Fplatforms|2032860|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%255Fof%255FC%255FSharp%255Fand%255FJava|2032861|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET%255FFramework#.NET%255Fvs.%255FJava%255Fand%255FJava%255FEE|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%255Fof%255Fthe%255FJava%255Fand%255F.NET%255Fplatforms|2|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%255Fof%255FC%255FSharp%255Fand%255FJava^0|0|0|29|0|0|0|2A|1|0|0|1X|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$D|11|E|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@$D|15|E|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|U]]]]

Have you seen these?

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET%5FFramework#.NET%5Fvs.%5FJava%5Fand%5FJava%5FEE" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET%5FFramework#.NET%5Fvs.%5FJava%5Fand%5FJava%5FEE</a>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%5Fof%5Fthe%5FJava%5Fand%5F.NET%5Fplatforms" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%5Fof%5Fthe%5FJava%5Fand%5F.NET%5Fplatforms</a>

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%5Fof%5FC%5FSharp%5Fand%5FJava" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison%5Fof%5FC%5FSharp%5Fand%5FJava</a>

blocks|key|500381|text|我是一个做过C%2B%2B、Java和现在的C#开发的程序员。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|500382|以下是我对最初问题的回答：|500383|WCF+=+EJBS/J2EE服务器(例如JBoss)|500384|WPF+=+Swing+(JavaFX)|500385|JBoss+=我认为WCF不需要服务器，只需在.net运行时运行。不过，我不太确定，还在学习。JVM和CLR:+CLR可以完成JVM所能做的一切，但是CLR也可以:运行非托管代码，将一个进程分离为多个逻辑进程(AppDomains)。与java相比有很好的C%2B%2B集成，CLR只是更好。语言c#也优于java+(Lambda的、删除的、表达式树、引用、结构、扩展方法、部分类、泛型的、没有装箱的)。他们在这里做得很好！)但只运行在窗户上。|500386|WF=不知道它是否存在|500387|Linq+=目前无法用Java实现，因为您需要:Lambda的、表达式树和扩展方法|500388|ADO.net数据服务:我不知道java中有什么模拟器，但这可以很容易地实现。可能存在于某个露天市场项目中。|500389|在做了这两件事之后，我对它们之间的关系得出了结论：|500390|.net更容易学习，非常容易，但也同样强大。之所以如此，是因为api中方法的命名更加一致，解决方案的集成性更好，一些api的设计也更好(WPF就是一个例子，其他api还在学习，不能这么说)。因此，.net程序员的成本将更低。|500391|用c#开发应用程序的速度将是Java的1.5至2倍。在那里IDE+(视觉工作室)感觉更好。你可以在20分钟内把它延长，不是吧！尝试理解eclypse扩展机制不是一件容易的事情！Eclipse代码重构功能是win的一条腿。电视演播室赢了很多人。(可以提供商业插件吗？)|500392|在使用.Net时，您可能需要支付许可证，用于操作系统和IIS。对于数据库，您可以使用MySQL进行处理。|500393|对于java，您将不必支付许可证。然而，在现实中，你仍然需要梅斯。严肃的应用程序运行Redhad或其他一些非免费操作系统。web服务器可能完全免费。而且，这些系统很难管理，因此您的管理员可能会花费更多。|500394|我是一个java认证的开发人员(92%25)，也是webservices认证的(JSP，servlets，87%25)和web组件开发人员认证(EJB，82%25)。我也是微软认证的开发人员(90%25)和认证的WPF开发人员(90%25)。Java考试比微软考试难。这是因为java考试问了许多幼稚的无关问题，比如持久化对象的正确方法名称是什么:+SaveChanges()、PersistChanges()、EmitChanges()或SendChangesToDatabase()。任何人都知道，知道方法名称是没有用的。IDE将为您提供正确的名称。如果您的方法名称彼此模拟，那么您就会有一个非常糟糕和令人困惑的api！重要的是你知道你为什么这么叫它！微软的考试更多关注的是为什么要这么做。在我看来，微软考试确实帮助你成为一个更好的程序员。Java考试也很有用，但更像是学习一本电话簿；它很难，但没有用。|500395|总之，我认为C#具有技术上的优势(这是合乎逻辑的，因为他们从java中学到了很多东西，并购买了世界上最聪明的人来编写它)。您将支付更多的许可证，但可能更少的人。|500396|很晚了，我累了，不想再读了。我应该，我知道。但不会。我这里没有拼写检查器，所以可能会有很多错误。我的第一种语言是荷兰语，我的第二种法语，第三种是英语(我住在比利时，我们很复杂)，所以我想我可以打一些错误？:)|500397|希望这能为你提供一些清晰的信息。|500398|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|S|5|6|7|1I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|Y|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Z|3|10|5|6|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|6|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|14|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|15|3|16|5|6|7|1P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|-4|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|18|$]]

I am a programmer who has done C++, Java and now C# development.

Here is my answer to the initial question:

WCF = EJBS/J2EE server (e.g. JBoss)

WPF = Swing (JavaFX)

JBoss = I don't think WCF needs a server, just runs in the .net runtime. Not sure about this though, still learning. JVM vs CLR: CLR can do everything JVM can, but CLR can also: run unmanaged code, separate one process into multiple logical ones (AppDomains). Has very good C++ intergration compared to java, CLR is just better. Language c# is also better than java (Lambda's, delegetes, Expression trees, references, structs, extension methods, partial classes, generic without boxing. They did a very good job here!) but only runs on windows.

WF=don't know if it exist, might

Linq = Currently cannot be implemented in Java because you need: Lambda's, Expression trees and extension methods

ADO.net dataservices: I don't know of something simular in java but this could be easily implemented. Probably exists in some opensourse project.

Having done both this is my conclusion about how they relate:

.net is easier to learn, very much so, yet equally powerful. The reason for this is because there naming of methods in api's is more consistent, there solutions are better integerated and some api's are designed much better (WPF is an example of this, can't say this for other api's, still learning). Because of this .net programmers will cost less.

Developing an app in c# will be 1.5 to 2 times faster than in Java.
There IDE (visual studio) feels better. You can extend it in 20 minutes, no shit!
Trying to understand the eclypse extension mechanisms is not an easy task! Eclipse code refactoring functionality win's one leg. Visual studio win's on many others. (Commercial plugins may be available?)

When using .Net you may have to pay licences, for the operating system, and for IIS.
For the database you could get away with MySQL.

For java you will not have to pay licences. However in reality you mays still have to.
Serious applications run an Redhad or some other none free OS. The web server may be completely free. Also these systems are harder to manage, so your administrator will probably cost more.

I am a java certified developer (92%), also webservices certified (JSP, servlets, 87%) and web component developer certified (EJB's, 82%). I am also a microsoft certified developer (90%) and a certified WPF developer (90%). Java exams are harder than microsoft exams.
This is because java exams ask many childish irrelevant question's. Like what is the correct method name to persist an object: SaveChanges(), PersistChanges(), EmitChanges() or SendChangesToDatabase().
Anybody knows that knowing the method name is not usefull. You IDE will provide you with the correct name. And if you truly had methodnames so simular to each other, than you have a very bad and confusing api! What matters is that you know why you call it! Microsoft exams focus more on the why that the how. In my opinion microsoft exams really help you to be a better programmer. Java exams are also usefull, but more like studying a phone book; it's very hard but useless.

In summary I believe C# is technicaly superieur (would be logical since they learned a lot from java and bought the smartest people in the world to write it). You will pay more on licenses but probably less on people. 

It's late, i'm tired and don't feel like rereading. I should, I know. But won't. I don't have a spellchecker here so there may be many typo's. My first is language is Dutch, my second French and my third is English (I live in Belgium, we are complicated), so I guess I'm allowed some typo's right? :) 

Hope this provides some clarity for you.

We are thinking about combining .NET technology with Java technology (WCF, JBoss/ESB, MOM, WPF, WF) and I need to have a high-level idea of what are the apples and oranges in the .NET 3.5 and Java worlds. 

Does anyone know of a good, clear article or better yet a simple chart which answers questions such as:

<ul>
<li>WCF in the Java world is ______</li>
<li>the equivalent of WPF in the Java world is _____</li>
<li>the closes thing to JBoss in the .NET world is _____</li>
<li>the JVM and CLR are essentially the same except for these differences: ....</li>
<li>in the Java world you don't have the concept of WF/WCF/WPF, instead you have ....</li>
<li>there is no "LINQ" in the Java world yet, but you can use ___</li>
<li>the closest you get to ADO.NET Data Services in the Java world is ....</li>
</ul>

I'm not looking to debate this so I'm not looking for "fighting points", I just need a neutral what-is-what chart comparing the two worlds.

Looking for a .NET 3.5 / J2EE architecture concept comparison article/chart

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我们正在考虑将.NET技术与Java技术(WCF、JBoss/ESB、MOM、WPF、WF)结合起来，我需要对.NET 3.5和Java世界中的苹果和橙子有一个高层次的认识。有没有人知道一篇好的、清晰的文章，或者更好的是一张简单的图表来回答以下问题：Java世界中的WCF是______。在Java世界中，与WPF等价的...

问寻找.NET 3.5 / J2EE架构概念比较文章/图表
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问寻找.NET 3.5 / J2EE架构概念比较文章/图表EN