Google推荐的图片加载库Glide介绍

dependencies { compile 'com.squareup.picasso:picasso:2.5.1' } 

dependencies { compile 'com.github.bumptech.glide:glide:3.5.2' compile 'com.android.support:support-v4:22.0.0' }  

Picasso.with(context)  
    .load("http://inthecheesefactory.com/uploads/source/glidepicasso/cover.jpg") .into(ivImg);  

Glide.with(context)  
    .load("http://inthecheesefactory.com/uploads/source/glidepicasso/cover.jpg") .into(ivImg); 

public class GlideConfiguration implements GlideModule {
     

    @Override  
    public void applyOptions(Context context, GlideBuilder builder) {  
        // Apply options to the builder here. 
        builder.setDecodeFormat(DecodeFormat.PREFER_ARGB_8888);  
    }  

    @Override  
    public void registerComponents(Context context, Glide glide) {  
        // register ModelLoaders here. 
    }  
} 

<meta-data android:name="com.inthecheesefactory.lab.glidepicasso.GlideConfiguration" android:value="GlideModule"/>  

<p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294447874.jpg" alt="quality2" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">这样看起来就会好很多。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">我们再来看看内存开销图，这次貌似Glide花费了两倍于上次的内存，但是Picasso的内存开销仍然远大于Glide。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294918728.png" alt="ram2_1" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">原因在于Picasso是加载了全尺寸的图片到内存，然后让GPU来实时重绘大小。而Glide加载的大小和ImageView的大小是一致的，因此更小。当然，Picasso也可以指定加载的图片大小的：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .resize(768, 432)  
    .into(ivImgPicasso);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">但是问题在于你需要主动计算ImageView的大小，或者说你的ImageView大小是具体的值（而不是wrap_content），你也可以这样：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .fit()  
    .centerCrop()  
    .into(ivImgPicasso);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">现在Picasso的内存开销就和Glide差不多了。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294433243.png" alt="memory3" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">虽然内存开销差距不到，但是在这个问题上Glide完胜Picasso。因为Glide可以自动计算出任意情况下的ImageView大小。</p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t3"></a><span class="section-heading">Image质量的细节</span></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">这是将ImageView还原到真实大小时的比较。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294704430.png" alt="quality3" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">你可以看到，Glide加载的图片没有Picasso那么平滑，我还没有找到一个可以直观改变图片大小调整<a href="http://lib.csdn.net/base/31" class="replace_word" title="算法与数据结构知识库" target="_blank" style="color:#df3434; font-weight:bold;">算法</a>的方法。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">但是这并不算什么坏事，因为很难察觉。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t4"></a>磁盘缓存</h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso和Glide在磁盘缓存策略上有很大的不同。Picasso缓存的是全尺寸的，而Glide缓存的是跟ImageView尺寸相同的。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294110987.jpg" alt="cache" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">上面提到的平滑度的问题依然存在，而且如果加载的是RGB565图片，那么缓存中的图片也是RGB565。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"> </p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">我尝试将ImageView调整成不同大小，但不管大小如何Picasso只缓存一个全尺寸的。Glide则不同，它会为每种大小的ImageView缓存一次。尽管一张图片已经缓存了一次，但是假如你要在另外一个地方再次以不同尺寸显示，需要重新下载，调整成新尺寸的大小，然后将这个尺寸的也缓存起来。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">具体说来就是：假如在第一个页面有一个200x200的ImageView，在第二个页面有一个100x100的ImageView，这两个ImageView本来是要显示同一张图片，却需要下载两次。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">不过，你可以改变这种行为，让<span style="color:rgb(41,128,185)">Glide</span>既缓存全尺寸又缓存其他尺寸：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Glide.with(this)  
     .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
     .diskCacheStrategy(DiskCacheStrategy.ALL)  
     .into(ivImgGlide);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">下次在任何ImageView中加载图片的时候，全尺寸的图片将从缓存中取出，重新调整大小，然后缓存。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Glide的这种方式优点是加载显示非常快。而Picasso的方式则因为需要在显示之前重新调整大小而导致一些延迟，即便你添加了这段代码来让其立即显示：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">//Picasso  
.noFade();</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/allimg/150327/163Aa632-0.gif" alt="loading3" style="border:none; max-width:100%; display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso和Glide各有所长，你根据自己的需求选择合适的。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">对我而言，我更喜欢Glide，因为它远比Picasso快，虽然需要更大的空间来缓存。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294447874.jpg" alt="quality2" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">这样看起来就会好很多。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">我们再来看看内存开销图，这次貌似Glide花费了两倍于上次的内存，但是Picasso的内存开销仍然远大于Glide。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294918728.png" alt="ram2_1" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">原因在于Picasso是加载了全尺寸的图片到内存，然后让GPU来实时重绘大小。而Glide加载的大小和ImageView的大小是一致的，因此更小。当然，Picasso也可以指定加载的图片大小的：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .resize(768, 432)  
    .into(ivImgPicasso);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">但是问题在于你需要主动计算ImageView的大小，或者说你的ImageView大小是具体的值（而不是wrap_content），你也可以这样：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .fit()  
    .centerCrop()  
    .into(ivImgPicasso);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">现在Picasso的内存开销就和Glide差不多了。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294433243.png" alt="memory3" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">虽然内存开销差距不到，但是在这个问题上Glide完胜Picasso。因为Glide可以自动计算出任意情况下的ImageView大小。</p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t5"></a><span class="section-heading">Image质量的细节</span></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">这是将ImageView还原到真实大小时的比较。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294704430.png" alt="quality3" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">你可以看到，Glide加载的图片没有Picasso那么平滑，我还没有找到一个可以直观改变图片大小调整算法的方法。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">但是这并不算什么坏事，因为很难察觉。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t6"></a>磁盘缓存</h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso和Glide在磁盘缓存策略上有很大的不同。Picasso缓存的是全尺寸的，而Glide缓存的是跟ImageView尺寸相同的。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445294110987.jpg" alt="cache" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">上面提到的平滑度的问题依然存在，而且如果加载的是RGB565图片，那么缓存中的图片也是RGB565。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"> </p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">我尝试将ImageView调整成不同大小，但不管大小如何Picasso只缓存一个全尺寸的。Glide则不同，它会为每种大小的ImageView缓存一次。尽管一张图片已经缓存了一次，但是假如你要在另外一个地方再次以不同尺寸显示，需要重新下载，调整成新尺寸的大小，然后将这个尺寸的也缓存起来。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">具体说来就是：假如在第一个页面有一个200x200的ImageView，在第二个页面有一个100x100的ImageView，这两个ImageView本来是要显示同一张图片，却需要下载两次。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">不过，你可以改变这种行为，让<span style="color:rgb(41,128,185)">Glide</span>既缓存全尺寸又缓存其他尺寸：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">Glide.with(this)  
     .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
     .diskCacheStrategy(DiskCacheStrategy.ALL)  
     .into(ivImgGlide);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">下次在任何ImageView中加载图片的时候，全尺寸的图片将从缓存中取出，重新调整大小，然后缓存。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Glide的这种方式优点是加载显示非常快。而Picasso的方式则因为需要在显示之前重新调整大小而导致一些延迟，即便你添加了这段代码来让其立即显示：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">//Picasso  
.noFade();</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/allimg/150327/163Aa632-0.gif" alt="loading3" style="border:none; max-width:100%; display:block; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso和Glide各有所长，你根据自己的需求选择合适的。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">对我而言，我更喜欢Glide，因为它远比Picasso快，虽然需要更大的空间来缓存。</p><br><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t7"></a><span class="section-heading">特性<br></span></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">你可以做到几乎和Picasso一样多的事情，代码也几乎一样。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><strong>Image Resizing</strong></p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">// Picasso  
.resize(300, 200);  

// Glide  
.override(300, 200);</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><strong>Center Cropping</strong></p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">// Picasso  
.centerCrop();  

// Glide  
.centerCrop();</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><strong>Transforming</strong></p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">// Picasso  
.transform(new CircleTransform())  

// Glide  
.transform(new CircleTransform(context))</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">设置占位图或者加载错误图：</p><pre class="js" style="white-space:pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-size:14px; line-height:26px; background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" name="code">// Picasso  
.placeholder(R.drawable.placeholder)  
.error(R.drawable.imagenotfound)  

// Glide  
.placeholder(R.drawable.placeholder)  
/*
* 提示：该行代码过长，系统自动注释不进行高亮。一键复制会移除系统注释 
* .error(R.drawable.imagenotfound)</pre><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">几乎和Picasso一样，从Picasso转换到Glide对你来说就是小菜一碟。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><span class="section-heading"> </span></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t8"></a><span class="section-heading">有什么Glide可以做而<span class="section-heading">Picasso</span>做不到</span></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Glide可以加在GIF动态图，而Picasso不能。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427445366503084.gif" alt="gifanimation2" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">同时因为Glide和Activity/Fragment的生命周期是一致的，因此gif的动画也会自动的随着Activity/Fragment的状态暂停、重放。Glide 的缓存在gif这里也是一样，调整大小然后缓存。<br></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">但是从我的一次测试结果来看Glide 动画会消费太多的内存，因此谨慎使用。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">除了gif动画之外，Glide还可以将任何的本地视频解码成一张静态图片。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">还有一个特性是你可以配置图片显示的动画，而Picasso只有一种动画：fading in。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">最后一个是可以使用<code>thumbnail()产生一个你所加载图片的<span style="color:rgb(22,160,133)">thumbnail</span>。</code></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><code>其实还有一些特性，不过不是非常重要，比如将图像转换成字节数组等。</code></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t9"></a><code>配置</code></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">有许多可以配置的选项，比如大小，缓存的磁盘位置，最大缓存空间，位图格式等等。可以在这个页面查看这些配置 <code><a target="_blank" href="https://github.com/bumptech/glide/wiki/Configuration" style="color:rgb(51,102,153); text-decoration:none">Configuration</a></code>。<br></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t10"></a>库的大小</h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso (v2.5.1)的大小约118kb，而Glide (v3.5.2)的大小约430kb。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427453389115686.png" alt="librarysize" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Anyway 312KB difference might not be that significant.</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">不过312kb的差距并不是很重要。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Picasso和Glide的方法个数分别是840和2678个。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><img class="width-100percent" src="http://jcodecraeer.com/uploads/20150327/1427453390188737.png" alt="methodcount" style="border:none; max-width:100%"></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">必须指出，对于DEX文件65535个方法的限制来说，2678是一个相当大的数字了。建议在使用Glide的时候开启ProGuard。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"><br></p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t11"></a><span class="section-heading">总结<br></span></h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">Glide和Picasso都是非常完美的库。Glide加载图像以及磁盘缓存的方式都要优于Picasso，速度更快，并且Glide更有利于减少OutOfMemoryError的发生，GIF动画是Glide的杀手锏。不过Picasso的图片质量更高。你更喜欢哪个呢？</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">虽然我使用了很长事件的Picasso，但是我得承认现在我更喜欢Glide。我的建议是使用Glide，但是将Bitmap格式换成 ARGB_8888、让Glide缓存同时缓存全尺寸和改变尺寸两种。</p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px"> </p><h2 style="margin:0px; padding:0px; color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; line-height:26px"><a name="t12"></a>相关资源</h2><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">- <a target="_blank" href="http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2014/09/glide-30-media-management-library-for.html" style="color:rgb(51,102,153); text-decoration:none">Glide 3.0: a media management library for Android</a></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">- <a target="_blank" href="https://github.com/bumptech/glide/wiki" style="color:rgb(51,102,153); text-decoration:none">Glide Wiki</a></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">- <a target="_blank" href="http://pluu.github.io/android%20study/2015/01/15/android-glide-picasso/" style="color:rgb(51,102,153); text-decoration:none">Android Picasso vs Glide</a></p><p style="color:rgb(51,51,51); font-family:Arial; font-size:14px; line-height:26px">- <a target="_blank" href="http://vardhan-justlikethat.blogspot.com/2014/09/android-image-loading-libraries-picasso.html" style="color:rgb(51,102,153); text-decoration:none">Android: Image loading libraries Picasso vs Glide</a></p><br>
*/

Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .resize(768, 432)  
    .into(ivImgPicasso); 

Picasso.with(this)  
    .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
    .fit()  
    .centerCrop()  
    .into(ivImgPicasso); 

Glide.with(this)  
     .load("http://nuuneoi.com/uploads/source/playstore/cover.jpg")  
     .diskCacheStrategy(DiskCacheStrategy.ALL)  
     .into(ivImgGlide); 

//Picasso 
.noFade();